Talk:Johns Hopkins–Navy football rivalry

Johns Hopkins–Navy football rivalry has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 4, 2014. (Reviewed version).

College football Low‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maryland: Baltimore Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Baltimore Task Force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Navy–Johns Hopkins football rivalry/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 23:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this over the next couple days, since this is currently the oldest nom awaiting a review. Wizardman 23:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found:

"who claimed eight national championships in ten years. Only Yale presented any form of challenge, claiming four national championships in the same time period" so there were 12 titles in 10 years? If so that's fine, just making sure I'm not misreading.

Yes, you're reading that right. I think there were actually more like 15.

"Hopkins first team was assembled in 1881," Hopkins'

Corrected.

"Navy returned the favor in the second half of the game, when" rm comma

Comma removed.

"The next year, in 1885, Naval Academy officials finally approved of the playing of football" How were Navy able to play up until then? Or was it just a situation where they allowed it but just looked the other way?

It was pretty much they just looked the other way, with the policy that, if anything happened, the students, not the Academy, would be held responsible.

Only a little bit that I found to be an issue. I'll put the article on hold and will pass when the above is fixed. Wizardman 00:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have attempted to correct or clarify all of your concerns. Thanks for the review. - A Texas Historian (Talk to me) 15:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman 04:11, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Navy–Johns Hopkins football rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140611173624/https://www.profootballresearchers.org/Articles/No_Christian_End.pdf to http://www.profootballresearchers.org/Articles/No_Christian_End.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

verifiability

@A Texas Historian and Jweiss11: Jweiss11 recently removed maintenance tags from this article without explanation, which has the obvious and unfortunate effect of dissuading editors from improving it.[1], [2]

GA stipulated and MOS:CITELEAD aside, the topic is likely notable, though this is less clear around the new sibling article at Johns Hopkins–Navy lacrosse rivalry. Regardless, this article does not currently seem to be well-sourced around the purported "rivalry" topic (which itself is insufficient per WP:NRIVALRY), though individual events are sourced. Can anyone add some direct "rivalry" citations or pull quotes from existing citations such as Bealle and Patterson? UW Dawgs (talk) 04:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UW Dawgs, I removed the tags because neither seemed to be appropriate. The artifice is generally well-sourced and the statement of an article's subject at the beginning of its lead generally doesn't require a citation. Are you questioning whether the subject of the article qualifies as a notable rivalry? If so, perhaps an AfD nomination is in order? Or maybe you want to call attention to this article at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football? Jweiss11 (talk) 15:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are 6 unsourced rivalry claims in the article body, which cascade into 7 unsourced claims in the lead plus infobox/article title. Do you observe any existing any citations for these rivalry claims? If so, would you please quote them? UW Dawgs (talk) 01:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]