Jump to content

Talk:Nature-positive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 talk 23:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that over 90 world leaders have commited to the Leaders' Pledge for Nature; to nature-positive policies, reversing biodiversity loss and full nature recovery by 2050?
  • Reviewed:
Created by Manxshearwater (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Battleofalma (talk) 12:29, 15 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Interesting topic and extensive article, earwig picks up some phrases but these are just long names for government departments and names of agreements. I slightly copyedited hook for length, its a bit long but within WP:DYKTRIM rules. QPQ not needed —John Cummings (talk) 21:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of "Controversy" section and expansion of "in practice" section

[edit]

Hello Wikipedians, I have added a controversy section to address the debate that has emerged around the nature-positive goal. I have also expanded the "in practice" section to include information on policies in Australia, the EU, Japan, the United Kingdom, and United Nations. I have plans to expand this section further to gain a more representative global view and to add to the "Approaches" section. If you have any suggestions/questions after my edit please let me know! Manxshearwater (talk) 08:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've just moved things around a little so that it's easier to find where things are. Also the "in practice" section would have become way too long. Please remember there should be no external links (as hyperlinks) in the main text. Please remove them e.g. by converting them into references. EMsmile (talk) 10:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for contributing with this edit and for the insight here on further changes! Manxshearwater (talk) 09:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]