Talk:Natural England

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biota of Great Britain and Ireland (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and Ireland, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Biota of Great Britain and IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandBiota of Great Britain and Ireland

England High‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Natural England is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed text

On reflection, you are perfectly correct about the NPOV and the need to remove this article. I will confine future updates to a NPOV to ensure quality and style of Wikipedia.

I today removed this text from the main article:

Natural England begins its existence in a troubled state. The two crucial elements of funding and leadership are clearly failing.
The parent body Defra is driving both a 12% efficiency saving agenda on Natural England and a further 7% cut because of a problems with its own funding. This will cripple the organisation at birth.
As import however are the problems of leadership. Staff feedback is showing that:
The leadership style is one of close Director control by people who lack the necessary skills and experience. The culture is being driven by fear, secrecy and ‘JFDI’. The outsourced arrangements which are to be supplied by Defra are being forced on the organisation when it is widely recognised that they provide a poor service, even for Defra, and clearly do not represent value for money. A vital part of the remit of this new organisation was to have be independent of Government – however Defra has been very clever and taken over control of fundamental elements (finance, estates, HR, systems, policy) which will mean Natural England is restricted at every turn of its development; effectively becoming a department controlled by Defra – which is not the most successful part of government.
The damning part of this whole situation is that the senior leadership team is blind to the importance of these issues. They have alienated staff who have are eager to make this organisation work, and they continue to waste huge amounts of tax payers money on consultants and external suppliers.
A sorry state with only a few weeks to go before vesting day.Without the issues of funding and culture being fixed then the vital work described below will amount to little.

This material is of great interest but does not meet Wikipedia's NPOV policy. If you're the author of this text, I'd be very interested to communicate with you and perhaps find a more appropriate outlet for your concerns. Contact me via my talk link that follows: Naturenet | Talk 09:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SSSI template

I've set up a new template, {{SSSI}}. Using * {{SSSI|1003826}} generates:

Link to example

I'm happy if people want to copy this for other countries; or to add a country/ designating body field and the relevant URLs. Andy Mabbett 11:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]