Talk:National Review (London)

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

National Review as Unitarian?

The article Reaction to Darwin's theory references "The review in the British Unitarian National Review". National Review (London) makes no reference to Unitarianism. Would it be logical to include some such reference? -- 201.19.11.75 12:03, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was a different National Review, published between 1855 and 1864, and edited by Walter Bagehot and Richard Holt Hutton. - Crosbiesmith 19:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I created National Review (1855), a particularly stubby stub, to avoid future confusion. - Crosbiesmith 19:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]