Jump to content

Talk:National Review (London)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

National Review as Unitarian?

[edit]

The article Reaction to Darwin's theory references "The review in the British Unitarian National Review". National Review (London) makes no reference to Unitarianism. Would it be logical to include some such reference? -- 201.19.11.75 12:03, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was a different National Review, published between 1855 and 1864, and edited by Walter Bagehot and Richard Holt Hutton. - Crosbiesmith 19:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I created National Review (1855), a particularly stubby stub, to avoid future confusion. - Crosbiesmith 19:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]