Jump to content

Talk:National Policing Improvement Agency

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

[edit]

Why has the reference link to Hydra and Minerva been taken off, without this reference few people are going to understand what the systems are for and what part they play in NPIA training. I personally added the sections Objectives of the NPIA, Serious Crime Analysis, Crime Operational Suppport, National Injuries Database, National Missing Persons Bureau, Training and the Technology section,. However when it comes to referencing my work or proividing links I have been prevented from doing so and the page is put back to the sections I originally added.

Can this page not be added to, what is wrong with a reference explaining what minerva and hydra are, indeed what was wrong with a link to the Metropolitan Police Crime Academy, one of the most important crime fighting academies in the world, and which has close links and operational ties with the NPIA.

It seems to me that petty moderating is destroying any attempt to even reference or explain such points in any detail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bamford (talkcontribs) 9 February 2008.

update to NPIA page

[edit]

{{editsemiprotected}} under the "Technology" section, there should be a link to "Impact Nominal Index" as this is an NPIA computer system. Could someone add that in for me please?

Done--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 03:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

COI

[edit]

I assume this page is tagged with COI because of the editor Bamford possibly being the author James Bamford. I can't find any other reasons why it would be. He hasn't edited in over a year so I think the tag can be removed. Smartse (talk) 14:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the COI tag should be removed. The discussion was in Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 22. It was not the author James Bamford, though. Somebody in the UK connected with the agency. EdJohnston (talk) 15:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotection review

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

See also Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 22#National Policing Improvement Agency.

After 18 months I think it's time to decide whether this semiprotection is still necessary. As well as welcoming the opinions of regular editors, I have contacted Hu12, the protecting admin. --TS 06:43, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Agree, I've unlocked it.--Hu12 (talk) 13:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

NDPR ?

[edit]

The government list of QUANGOs today has for the NPIA "No longer an NDPB" but the article reads "The United Kingdom's National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) is a non-departmental public body". Which is correct? --jmb (talk) 17:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on National Policing Improvement Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]