Jump to content

Talk:National Police Cadet Corps

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cadet Inspector (NPCC) or not?

[edit]

The Cadet Inspector ranks are the only ranks in the entire NPCC Rank Structure which do not have the additional (NPCC) suffix. This is because the rank of Cadet Inspector is a rank created by the NPCC Council.

Hmm... as far as I know the Cadet Inspector ranks do indeed have the (NPCC) suffix, despite the fact that the rank is created by the Council and does not exist in the SPF. By that logic, the ranks of CDT and LCP do not exist in the SPF either and should not have the (NPCC) suffix...

Not sure if there are any guidelines on this, in fact according to this [[1]](which has wrong info, like H/P/Insp instead of P/H/Insp) only P/Insp and above are listed with the (NPCC) suffix.

Anyone else can shed any light on this?

Delirious prince 13:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the latest directive the CI ranks do indeed have the (NPCC) suffix.

Fixed. Delirious prince 20:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if land cadets get to fire the m16 rifles...and even so, it should be simulator only....the .22 is live though....

I am not aware of any use of m16 rifle apart from parade... not even simulator. --Delirious prince 14:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new NPCC council. http://www.npcc.gov.sg/files/EPORT%20February%20Issue.pdf --chunchuan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.2.20 (talk) 06:58, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because this article is not a violation of copyright as claimed. In fact, it is quite obvious the copying went from wikipedia to the blog page which was done by youths, and not in the other direction as claimed. And even if we assume sections of this page were copied from the blog, a simple deletion of the offensive section would have sufficed. I hope the nominator can at least take the trouble and check that they are deleting a page about Singapore's largest youth uniformed group organisation before simply flagging arbitrarily.--Huaiwei (talk) 14:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC):[reply]

I do not like articles like this. The previous version before my removal of a large chunk of content was like an advert for NPCC. I am fully aware about NPCC. I just hope that this page can be completely rewritten from a proper perspective. And that was NOT an edit war... ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 14:58, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • In case you have not realised, Wikipedia does not function based on your personal likes of any one article. Whether content is an advertisement or not is not for any single person to judge, but for the community to do so. Care explain to me how a pledge or a list of units amounts to an advertisement? If a list like this is an advertisement, I suppose you are going to launch an cleanup against articles such as Singapore Airlines destinations, List of Singapore MRT stations or perhaps also List of schools in Singapore, since I am unsure if you have even gotten a proper education on how to work amicably with others? Until you can convince without a doubt that the content you removed amounts to advertising, I am restoring them as I regard your deletions as actions done in bad faith.--Huaiwei (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just noticed that you are the same individual who had the audacity to delete an entire article on the [[National Cadet Corps (Singapore)] with a reasoning as flippant and ridiculous as the ones for this article. Since you consider it good practice to take the easy way out by actually deleting entire articles instead of taking the harder road of improving them, good luck in doing the rewriting the article yourself. And since I now suspect you have done more damage than two articles, I took a look at your talkpage. It is disappointing to discover that a Singaporean is giving this country a bad name not just for deleting articles of obvious notability, but also for his unprofessional behaviour across the site.--Huaiwei (talk) 03:48, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Police Cadet Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:55, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on National Police Cadet Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 00:22, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of information

[edit]

Would like to know why so much information has been deleted from this article? It is now down to a minimum, it seems like some information that would have been useful was also deleted.

NCC's article also has a lot of information similar to what was deleted from this article. Doesn't make sense for it to be deleted here, as the information was objective. 138.75.151.208 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:National_Police_Cadet_Corps&oldid=1204206763"