Talk:National Labour Party (UK, 1957)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Labour Party (UK, 1957). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525130306/http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/features/century/cbf.php?include=page6 to http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/features/century/cbf.php?include=page6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:54, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bud Flanagan

The article contained a sentence: "The party was even briefly linked to the London gangster Albert Dimes, who hoped to use NLP members against his rivals Bud Flanagan and Jack Spot, two Jewish gangsters who were involved in funding the 43 Group."

This is sourced accurately to Graham Macklin, Very Deeply Dyed in Black, IB Tauris, 2007, p. 53.

User:Elvislived removed the reference to Bud Flanagan, reasoning, "Removed reference to Bud Flanagan as a Jewish gangster. The source cited Macklin Very Deeply Dyed in Black, says that Flanagan was a Jewish gangster, this is wrong. He was in fact a Jewish music hall entertainer." Which, of course he was; at least the well-known Bud Flanagan was. But the source is clear, and Macklin is a reliable and respected authority in the field. I reverted, with the comment: "You might have considered that there could be more than one Bud Flanagan - read the source."

User:Elvislived again deleted the Flanagan reference, saying that Macklin ".. just gets it wrong as he think the Crazy Gang is the name of a gang..."

Now, while it is very risky to question a noted authority, on reflection I think User:Elvislived may have a point. It is, of course, always possible that there was a gangster, real or so-nicknamed, called Bud Flanagan, and he could have had a gang which would naturally have been known therefore as the Crazy Gang, in "homage" to the entertainers, but I have set about further research in this matter and will report back when done. Emeraude (talk) 12:35, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was that Bud Flanagan, but the context is wrong. I e-mailed Macklin who explained that two sentences had been corrupted in editing the book. The reference to Flanagan should have appeared in a sentence after "Jewish gangsters like... " referencing him as the noted music hall entertainer. Mackiln also signposted a story in The Guardian that gives detail on the 43 Group, and Flanagan's role, and I have acordingly used this as a reference in rewriting that passage in the Wikipedia article. Emeraude (talk) 09:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]