Talk:National Intelligence Law of the People's Republic of China

A fact from National Intelligence Law of the People's Republic of China appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 July 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Chinese citizens are lawfully required to spy for the state?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/National Intelligence Law.

Wikipedia

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

dyk nom

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Chinese citizens and companies have a legal responsibility and obligation of participation in intelligence work regardless of geographic boundaries? Source:For Chinese citizens and companies alike, participation in ‘intelligence work’ is a legal responsibility and obligation, regardless of geographic boundaries. For instance, Article 7 of the National Intelligence Law (国家情报法) declares: Any organisation and citizen shall, in accordance with the law, support, provide assistance, and cooperate in national intelligence work, and guard the secrecy of any national intelligence work that they are aware of
- ALT1:... that Chinese citizens are lawfully required to spy for the state? Source:Spying for the state is a duty of the citizens and corporations of China under the law, much like paying taxes.
- ALT2:... that China's National Intelligence Law creates the obligation of Chinese citizens to support national intelligence work? Source: Article 7 of the law, Gu writes, creates the “obligation of Chinese citizens to support national intelligence work.”
- ALT3:... that China's National Intelligence Law makes everyone responsible for state security? Source: The intelligence law highlights one important continuing trend within the state security legal structure put in place since 2014: everyone is responsible for state security.
- ALT4:... that China's state security legal structure including the National Intelligence Law makes everyone responsible for state security? Source: The intelligence law highlights one important continuing trend within the state security legal structure put in place since 2014: everyone is responsible for state security.

Reviewed: Central Police Canteen
Comment: All of the hooks say the same thing

Created by DiplomatTesterMan (talk). Self-nominated at 11:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited sufficiently well, and any of the hooks could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:54, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Translation Cited is nonsense

Hi, the translation you have linked to is an often nonsensical machine translation. Look at article 11 for an obviously incoherent example:

Article 11 The state intelligence work institutions shall collect and handle the acts or acts of foreign institutions, organizations and individuals that are implemented or instructed or funded by others, or colluded by domestic and foreign institutions, organizations and individuals to endanger the national security and interests of the People's Republic of China. Relevant information provides information or reference for preventing, stopping and punishing the above actions. 209.74.125.47 (talk) 19:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quote from the Swedish report

Someone had left out the word could when quoting from that report. I put it back in. Steven1Yee (talk) 21:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]