Talk:National Institute of Development Administration

Thailand Mid‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

NPOV? I think not!

This article is littered with major grammatical errors which mirror the style of errors made on the official NIDA website. I strongly suspect the page has been at least partly authored by employees of NIDA and this accounts for the lack of NPOV throughout. I'm not, however, going to mess with it, on the grounds that I know nothing of the institution and don't have the time. But somebody should try to beef this up a bit and make it a bit more neutral! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.5.64.141 (talk) 14:40, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

exactly what I thought, and the reason I came to the talk page. Even the logic of the statements is beyond me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.74.221.156 (talk) 19:17, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I marked the article as unreferenced and removed a claim that it was "Thailand's most prestigious graduate university." Prestige is not quantifiable, so that's not going to get a reference. If a notable source has described the university as the most prestigious, that can be added, but you can't objectively assert that it is. The claim that "its MBA program ranked in the number one" is grammatically incorrect and needs clarification and a source. Which ranking? "Ranked number one/ranked first" or "ranked in the number one (something)"? —LX (talk, contribs) 09:06, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Institute of Development Administration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150806064713/http://toprankingmba.com:80/topmba_asia.htm to http://toprankingmba.com/topmba_asia.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Independence in polling/ Junta support

Since this school is always used by the Thai junta for its polling, there should be some investigation into the independence in its research and its faculty members relationships to the junta and political groups which support/supported the junta. There are too many questionable polls coming out in favor of the junta by some organizations to consider them fair and balanced in the current environment in Thailand which involves the junta censorship,threats to critics, jailings, etc. If this topic can not be added to the article please leave my comment as a note of protest to the incompleteness of this page. 125.24.67.66 (talk) 03:41, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Institute of Development Administration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160202170612/http://www.jdba.bus.tu.ac.th/about.htm to http://jdba.bus.tu.ac.th/about.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Institute of Development Administration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20150227175103/http://www2.bangkokpost.com/learning/6113_info_national-institute-of-development-administration-nida.html to http://www2.bangkokpost.com/learning/6113_info_national-institute-of-development-administration-nida.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]