Talk:National Forces Alliance

Africa: Libya Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libya portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libya (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please put in some sources for this. See WP:RS and WP:Verifiability. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. Jbhunley (talk) 18:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Women

What about its stance to :

women rights
religious rights

Yug (talk) 14:20, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moderate Islamism

If party leader is saying that "Some channels started referring to the National Forces Alliance as liberals – that's not true," stated Jibril. "It is composed of different political formations." and that the NFA is a moderate Islamic movement that recognises the importance of Islam in political life and favours Sharia as the basis of the law and NFA is eager to play down the "liberal" label then what is the problem ??? why it is not allowed to mention it as an "Moderate Islamist" party ??? Ahmed 313-326 —Preceding undated comment added 20:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Forces Alliance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:32, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]