Talk:National Christmas Tree (United States)

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was selected for DYK!

A fact from National Christmas Tree (United States) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 December 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the first U.S. National Christmas Tree (pictured) was lit up by President Calvin Coolidge on Christmas Eve in 1923?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/December.

Wikipedia

++Lar: t/c 09:02, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Territories in the lead

The lead has been changed twice (at least) to spell out that there are 56 smaller trees around the National Christmas Tree, and to list just how many represent D.C. and unincorporated territories of the U.S. Editors keep adding the word "inhabited", even though no American unincorporated territory is un-inhabited, and no citation distinguishes between inhabited and uninhabited. Furthermore, listing just how many trees represent this or that is information which is far too specific for the lead; the lead is about general information, not about ultra-specific information such as how many unincorporated territories there are and whether each has a small tree or not. That's for the main text to discuss. - Tim1965 (talk) 17:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on National Christmas Tree (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon footprint?

It would be great to know an accurate carbon footprint of the National Christmas Tree, in particular, to help keep Christmas-lovers mindful of our tree consumption and its impact. Maybe someone somewhere has made an estimate of its impact that could be included. I've searched superficially & it seems like a good topic for a Wikipedia crowdsource effort, IMHO. Questions! What is the marginal impact on logging in that Maryland forest (what would the tree have gone to otherwise)? What does the government do with it after it's taken down?

These questions are trivial in the light of this page "https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Christmas_tree#Environmental_issues" but to know the facts would be great for promoting clean energy use. The material there seems to indicate that a PVC tree might be better (providing the PVC would be recycled or, better, the tree could be reused next year!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thinkadoodle (talk • contribs) 17:20, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]