Talk:National Cannabis Summit

Cannabis Low‑importance

	Cannabis portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Colorado / 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Cannabis' "420 Collaboration" in 2017.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... (your reason here) --Aspro (talk) 21:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: In my opinion this is neither an article nor a stub. Suggestion: place in sandbox for time being. Because the National Cannabis Summit appears to echo [1] in so much, that both want to encourage a serious debate – even if the these two Org's don’t see eye-to-eye on every issue. Think stub is to early too soon. Needs a bit more. Keep going for it though. Certainly 'am not going to vote for SD in this case, because that will remove it from view and the chance that other editors can contribute more. Aspro (talk) 21:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]