Talk:National Assembly Building of Slovenia/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 09:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Will review. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 09:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- I would recommend keeping only one pronunciation in the lead so that it looks a bit less clumsy (see WP:MOSLEAD); the pronunciations can be stated in the infobox.
- Done
- We do not keep citations in the lead unless we make significant claims. Not a strict rule, just felt I should mention it.
- Cite number 1 (visitor numbers) has no other place in the text or infobox which it can be placed, cite number 2 now moved further down
- (Skupščina Republike Slovenije, It was opened Something wrong with the bracket?
- Done
- People's Assembly Building of the Republic of Slovenia and Palace of the People's Assembly need not be in bold.
- I think they do, as previous names for the place.
- You should add the Parliament (Parlament) as an a.k.a. name in the first line.
- Done
Construction
[edit]- of 394 feet (120 m) What is this? The height? The base diameter?
- Done clarified height
- A new legislature building was thereafter...bronze figures framing its main portico. Source?
- Done
- Twenty-seven master craftsmen As per WP:MOSNUM you should say "27", it would also appear less wordy.
- Done
- It was completed in 1959. Source?
- Done
- At the 1991 independence of Slovenia Better say "After the independence of Slovenia in 1991".
- Done changed to "following"
Design
[edit]- the main façade faces Republic Square and is inlaid with Karst marble, with green Oplotnica granite below each window. Does ref. 6 support this as well?
- That's supported by refs 6/3/7
- wall painting by the 20th century mural artist Slavko Pengov, extends across the length of the entrance hall and illustrates the history of Slovenians Does ref. 4 support this as well?
- It can, but ref 8 is there to do that
- the mural portrays events including You give the years for some events and not for others. Would be good to have consistency.
- The events which took place within a year have theirs. The world wars don't need to have years on and the last two items are connected to WWII.
- Following the 1991 independence of Slovenia No need to mention the year again, we know this already.
- What's the harm?
- Not adamant on this, just a suggestion of mine. Fine, keep it as you like. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:37, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Link or explain amphitheater
- Done
- Duplicate links: independence of Slovenia, Slovenian Parliament
- Done
Incidents
[edit]- Link granite, euro.
- Done
That should be it. These done, I would be glad to promote this. Cheers! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Changes made as ticked above. Rcsprinter123 (interface) 19:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick replies. I believe the article is ready for promotion now. Great job! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:39, 8 April 2016 (UTC)