Talk:Nasutixalus jerdonii

	Nasutixalus jerdonii is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

How many species in the genus?

The article is contradictory about how many species there are in this genus. The article introduces the genus as "monotypic" with a "sole species", but later describes an additional "unnamed species". Unless I'm misunderstanding something, this is a contradiction that needs to be resolved. 72.94.61.22 (talk) 20:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The paper just published by Bidu et al identified eight of the specimens that they collected as conspecific with the type specimen of Polypedates jerdonii, which they have proposed to move to a new genus Frankixalus. Their DNA testing also identified three specimens which they they regard as belonging to a closely related species congeneric with Frankixalus jerdoni. One of those specimens had previously been (mis)identified by another group as Theloderma moloch. So the genus is, for the moment, formally monotypic, but the authors who erected it clearly indicate that it should include a second species, which may be new to science. I agree the article doesn't explain it very well. William Avery (talk) 21:15, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The article makes more sense to me now. 72.94.61.22 (talk) 00:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frankixalus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160126135411/http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/Amphibia/Anura/Rhacophoridae/Rhacophorinae/Frankixalus to http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/Amphibia/Anura/Rhacophoridae/Rhacophorinae/Frankixalus

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vegetarian frog?

I've been reading about Frankixalus jerdonii on various websites which claim that the young eat their mother's eggs and the adults are vegetarians. Can this be verified? A vegetarian amphibian? If this is true, I'm amazed. Are there any other vegetarian amphibians, either extant or extinct? 2601:98A:400:82F8:3C8B:558E:9143:2C06 (talk) 05:30, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]