Talk:Naresh Kamboj

Naresh Kamboj was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 7, 2012). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

India: Politics Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

References

Hi, Had a look at the article, but found that the paras on early life, personal life, social views and positions held are unreferenced. There should be inline references supporting each fact in the article. Thanks. --Tinpisa (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Naresh Kamboj/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 04:12, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I took a read over this article, and I'm surprised it was nominated for GA status. Most of the article is unreferenced with only 3 refs total. There's not much sentence structure in the political career section (one huge paragraph), and I feel that finding those extra references would expand the article quite a bit as well. Beyond that the article would need a copyedit before a future nomination; I found five separate errors in the rather short lead without even trying. Article's not ready yet. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:12, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naresh Kamboj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130423081533/http://harenvironment.gov.in/html/notifications/State%20Environment%20Protection%20Council.pdf to http://harenvironment.gov.in/html/notifications/State%20Environment%20Protection%20Council.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]