Talk:Naomi Ginsberg

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 March 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Nova Scotia Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The discussion that was close at "no consensus" appears to be quite misleading. Indications of notability are not just below the borderline, but orders of magnitude below. The argument given (very clearly self-promoting) are base upon (1) two papers cited more than 100 times; in this filed there are tens of thousands of individuals with many more papers cited more than 100 times, with a tiny fraction of those having Wikipedia pages (2) a g-index of 25; most fellows of the American Physical Society have a higher g-index, and 300 fellows are elected annually (this person is not among them) (3) Receipt of a Sloan grant; Sloan grants are routinely awarded to junior scientists starting their career, and by no means are indications of notability (126 are awarded annually, and hardly any recipient has a Wiki page).

I think that such articles are insult to numerous scientists with hundred times more credentials that do not Wikipedia pages. Just to give you an example, Steven Kivelson is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and has g-index of 196 and h-index of 70, and does not have a page. Igor Mazin of the Naval research lab has h=58 and g=149, and does not have a page. These are just two of my acquaintances, randomly selected. Mdina (talk) 19:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Mdina[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naomi Ginsberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402105513/http://chemistry.berkeley.edu/publications/news/2011/chemistry_welcomes_naomi_ginsberg.php to http://chemistry.berkeley.edu/publications/news/2011/chemistry_welcomes_naomi_ginsberg.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]