Talk:Nancy Cruickshank

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 October 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

A fact from Nancy Cruickshank appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 December 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the British entrepreneur Nancy Cruickshank's second start-up, Handbag.com, became the number-one fashion and beauty website in the UK, with 1.5 million visits monthly?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nancy Cruickshank.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: Women in Leadership (2015)

This article was created or improved during the Women in Leadership edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in September 2015. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

Edits to De-Promotionalize

Closing per a WP:ANRFC request.
There is a clear consensus for the proposed removals, which were already implemented. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I propose deleting these portions of the article:

In 2000 she started a Women In Business program at Handbag.com, fielding thousands of business plans submitted by women and arranging start-up loans through Barclays Bank, the program's sponsor.

I'm innately concerned with this sentence because it's putting lipstick on a pig. Nancy was tying-in women to high-interest bank loans that they would then sign-over to her for her multi-level marketing scheme. That aside, however, it is sourced to two non-RS, something called "Erisea Magazine" which appears to be a non-RS website (plus it's an interview), and something called inspiringfifty.com, another non-RS website.

In addition to offering a distribution channel for niche products, MyShowcase provides mentoring, training, and flextime employment for over 400 women who wish to develop their own beauty businesses.

This sentence is inherently deceptive by phrasing a Cutco-style door-to-door commission-based selling program as "flextime employment" ... "own your own business!" is the marketing-speak these kind-of outfits use to recruit their "entrepreneurs" who usually make zilch (the company reels in everything from the initial investment these poor women are forced to indebt themselves to pay-out).

She is an active promoter of women in business.

Not sourced to RS.

She was named one of the fifty most inspiring women in European tech by the Inspiring Fifty organisation in 2015.

Awards program that, itself, does not pass GNG shouldn't be in lede.
LavaBaron (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - This woman sounds really skeezy, however, her PR rep has done a good job attempting to wrap-her in a couple puff piece interviews. While we can't OR a call-out on this, we should apply the highest normative standards for sources where we're able to do so. LavaBaron (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - summoned by bot. You don't need to do a RFC for this. This article was just created a week ago! Just be bold and fix it. —Мандичка^YO 😜 00:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Agree with the above user. Cheers, Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 20:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Comatmebro, et. al., in deference to your feedback I'm closing the RfC and making the changes. LavaBaron (talk) 20:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The DYK hook presented a claim by Ms Cruickshank in an interview as a fact... Nick-D (talk) 07:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nancy Cruickshank. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

There is a major error in this bio: she claims to have founded Handbag.com in 2000, but it was actually my brother, Dominic Riley who did so in 1999.

I visited Dominic in his office at Handbag in that year, and she wasn't there, because she wasn't there.

Email me on roofingag@gmaiul.com, and I will give you his mobile number. Dominic is currently the Chairman of Morgan Cars.(----)