Talk:Nancy Buchanan

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 11 March 2014 by reviewer Chris troutman (talk · contribs).

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic literature: Women

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic literatureTemplate:WikiProject Electronic literatureElectronic literature articles
	This article is supported by Women Electronic Literature Writers Task Force.

ArtAndFeminism

This article was created or improved at an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon in 2015.ArtAndFeminismWikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminismTemplate:ArtAndFeminism articleArtAndFeminism articles

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Mimi Zeiger (31 March 2014). "Past to Present: Unforgetting L.A. Uses Wikipedia as an Activist Art Platform". KCET Artbound. Archived from the original on 1 April 2014. Retrieved 1 April 2014.

External Links

moved here from the article. these dont seem to meet our guidelines for external links. Please discuss before reinserting. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that some of these would be ok if formatted differently. Should state what will be found at the link. For example, "PST Festival" could be:

Pacific Standard Time: Nancy Buchanan discusses Hair Transplant (1972)

(I have been assisting the primary editor of this page, who attended our recent meetup, so wanted it to be more clear) StaceyEOB (talk) 20:18, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where/how exactly does such an external link fit within the WP:EL guidelines? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any way in which it conflicts with those guidelines. If you could let me know where you feel it is in violation, I could better respond. Thanks. StaceyEOB (talk) 20:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@StaceyEOB: TRPoD is correct; As WP:EL specifies, external links should be things like "official" sites on the subject or media archives about it. Some of the links included are works by Buchanan which could be included in their own section (not as bare links, but URLs with citation-like details). Some of these links, like the KCET URL, could be references. Some, like the WGBH link, don't seem to belong here at all. External links should not look like a dumping ground of miscellaneous websites. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

specifically, do you this Pacific Standard Time link is problematic? I agree that many here do not apply but thought that was one that potentially would, and might make the issue clearer to Marilyn. thanks, Chris. StaceyEOB (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TRPoD's point about that link is formatting it to make it more descriptive. It can stay in the external link section. It'a a work of Buchanan's so it could serve as a reference better than an external link, in my opinion. Take a look at Pablo Picasso. There's a bunch of URLs included in the references but only a couple in external links. Those that are there are descriptive of what the URL is about. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it could be better used as a reference. But I wanted to give her an example of that that link should look like (not just "PST Festival" but * Pacific Standard Time: Nancy Buchanan discusses Hair Transplant (1972))—so that I know, is that still problematic? In this case, it isn't actually a work but audio of her discussing the context in which the work was first created/presented. Anyways, the article has larger problems to be addressed than these external links so probably best to leave it here. Thanks! StaceyEOB (talk) 00:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, StaceyEOB, Chris and TRPoD. I just marked this page "patrolled" assuming it means that I'm reading it and keeping up on the discussion. I will make changes as resolved. Best. Marilyn Nix (talk) 23:23, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Marilyn Nix: Actually, "patrolled" refers to the new pages patrol. We have Wikipedians checking every new page to ensure it's not patent nonsense or the like. Since I created this talk page, someone else has to "patrol" it, which is what you've done. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:27, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]