Talk:Naming firm
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Delete
[edit]This is pointless fluff. Looks like a ploy by Igor or Tungsten to drive traffic to their sites.
Delete!
71.163.60.112 10:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]The notability of the subject is currently unclear, since no sources are cited. By the notability criteria, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be press articles or books, for example. I am referring here to sources that would cover the concept of naming firms, not only directory listings of such firms.
If sources cannot be found, or can be found only partially, one might also consider to merge this article into Product naming, as far as it is verifiable.
For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 09:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Brands articles
- Mid-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- Stub-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Mid-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles