Talk:Namib day gecko

A fact from Namib day gecko appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 September 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Namib day gecko can sprint at 2.5 m/s (8 ft/s) in bright light?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Namib day gecko.

Wikipedia

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Namib day gecko is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Correct image?

@Cwmhiraeth and Pvmoutside: I added this image because I saw the article on WP:DYK, and I like finding images for articles. However, I'm afraid I wouldn't know a Namib day gecko if it bit me (so to speak), and now, a few minutes later, I'm no longer certain that it's correct. It was labeled "Namib Day Gecko (Bradfield's)" where I found it on Flickr, which is why I thought it was a perfectly fine Namib day gecko. But now I see that there is a separate article for Rhoptropus bradfieldi, so maybe it's better for that? Could it be a useful image for both? Pinging main authors of both articles on the assumption that you might know the subject better. --GRuban (talk) 14:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding the image. Perhaps if I expand the Rhoptropus bradfieldi stub I will find that there are identifying features which clarify which species this is. Meanwhile, let's leave it where it is. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]