Talk:Naked Conversations

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

"Naked Conversations" is a notable book that should be included in Wikipedia. As social media platforms and the blogosphere becomes more mainstream in business communications models this book provides a framework about how to the use blogs to facilitate effective communications between companies, consumers and other stakeholders for the benefit of all.

OK, that's an assertion of notability, but can you back that up with any reference in Secondary sources? At the moment the article re-states the thesis of the book, but if you had sources to agree or disagree specifically with the book, they would help show that the book had had an impact and was therefore notable. TrulyBlue (talk) 16:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

lots here when you spell the author's name right, which I have fixed in the article. It needs cleanup for sure, but the PROD never should have been reinstated. It can be removed by anyone at any time. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 18:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]