Talk:Naga Sai Mandir

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).

Hinduism Mid‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Re-organizatoin/ Subjective Article

Hey all, I plan on reorganizing and cleaning up this article, I'll try to keep you all posted on edits and ask for clarification if needed from anyone available (but since not many have posted on the talk page, I'm not sure how much feedback I will get). In any case, let me know how you feel about edits and rephrasing. Thanks! Jazzalexa22 (talk) 15:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stubbify to Remove Original Research

Unfortunately, this article seems to be self-plagiarized or plagiarized, here is the original article, however none of the information can be truly verified and seems to come from only two sources verbatim. Compare to

http://www.srinagasai.com/nagasai.html

http://www.srinagasai.com/abouttrust.html

to see plagiarism/self-plagiarism.

Here is the link to the article's last edit before the stub:

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Naga_Sai_Mandir&oldid=768988711

Jazzalexa22 (talk) 15:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will second Jazzalexa22's assessment here. Note that the plagiarized material is directly from the institution website at stake. Her stubify was reverted by another author whose sole edit appears to be on this article. Likely a WP:COI in addition to WP:Plagiarism and WP:Promo. This material does need to be removed. Thanks Etherfire (talk) 18:43, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]