Jump to content

Talk:Nadia Bolz-Weber

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) -- it has 4 reliable sources: Washington Post, Denver Post, Daily Mail, On Being. why would anyone improve from a stub, if it's on BS's kill list. Duckduckgo (talk) 22:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • You should retract that last statement immediately, as you have no grounds for that statement. Whilst you not the article creator, who recreated what was essentially, still is, a copy of the original added a couple of new sources it still far off GNG and even then its essentially WP:one event that the notable sources cover. I fully intend to take this back to AFD if necessary for another community discussion.Blethering Scot 23:19, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, Duckduckgo, you should probably tone that down a bit and I'm just going to boldly strike that comment for you. This was recreated by John Hajicek only a month after being deleted by community consensus. Yes, there was a view that more coverage might establish notability but individual editors making personal decisions about when that has occurred (as opposed to taking it to DRV for consideration) probably isn't the best idea. Ignoring consensus and simply declaring notability has been established is going to raise eyebrows. Would DRV permit recreation on the basis of new coverage? Yeah, quite possibly, but at this stage I would work on the basis that this is going to be taken back to AFD because that hasn't been properly established. Stalwart111 02:08, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks User: Stalwart111. I have now taken back to AFD.Blethering Scot 16:42, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I stand by my comment. i'm confident that a reasonable person reviewing BS's conduct will agree with me. take it to whatever tribunal you dare. Duckduckstop (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you watch, what you say. You were and still are on a thin line with comments like that.Blethering Scot 19:25, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan

[edit]

Article is still currently an orphan, unsure where would be relevant to include links to this bio.Blethering Scot 22:22, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Evangelical Lutheran Church in America? List of notable Lutherans? --Tbanderson (talk) 23:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nadia Bolz-Weber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Media coverage

[edit]

This section is inappropriate and unnecessary. It violates numerous guidelines on what wikipedia is, and link farms, not news etc.. and it has many unreliable sources. It makes the article appear to be a COI case. Sources are included when they add to the body of the article in some was, integrated into the article, we don't list every source that mentions a topic. -- GreenC 00:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]