Talk:Nabil Ahmad

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Nabil Ahmad in 2016

• ... that Nabil Ahmad (pictured) became a comedian after a friend unexpectedly signed him up to audition for a reality show? Source: "It all started with a prank back in 2008 when Nabil Ahmad’s friends had secretly signed him up for an audition for a reality TV show that searches for comedic talent called Raja Lawak (King of Comedy)." https://today.salamweb.com/nabil-ahmad-mr-funnyman/

• Reviewed: TBD, will get to soon!Template:Did you know nominations/Bright Star (roller skater)

Created by GRuban (talk). Self-nominated at 14:28, 6 November 2020 (UTC).

Interesting career on good sources, Malayan source accepted AGF (but it should be marked as such), no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed and a good illustration. If not taken, there should be some indication in the wording that this doesn't play in the US. I'd prefer "secretly" in the hook. Yes, I know, the article should avoid that for being too close to the source. - In the article, I'd change these "He says". Imagine five years from now. Rather mention a date/year. I think the translation given in the source above should also be in the article. Also awaiting qpq. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, about that qpq. Looking into that today. Go to a random day, November 1, pick the first unreviewed entry. Created by Gerda Arendt. Decide I probably shouldn't review the nomination by the person who's reviewing my nomination, that's a bit too much quid pro quo in the quid pro quo. Go to the next entry that day: created by Louis Alain and Gerda Arendt. Wow. Go to the third. Created by Louis Alain and Gerda Arendt. Great Caesar's Ghost, Gerda, it's like you're a DYK monopoly or something! --GRuban (talk) 00:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Found one you didn't write! --GRuban (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Grinning: do you have to point out my bad habit (of nominating last minute or after)? All other noms for 1 November have long been approved I guess, while I placed mine there just yesterday. Blame LouisAlain for the congestion, - I stick to one article per day, but that was one by LA on 6 November and another on 7 November, and all due yesterday. - Actually: I do it opposite and try to find a nom by a reviewer ;) - Now what about the translation of Raja Lawak in the article? And "says"? Now that I looked again: could you give a bit more overview in the lead? And being asked to interview the academy award recipients would also make a fine hook ;)

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Expanded lead, added King of Comedy translation, removed one or two "says" (leaving two, as I can't think of a better way to phrase it, suggestions welcome), but I am not actually that intrigued by him being asked to interview the academy award recipients. I put it in because the article made it out like a big deal, but to me it does not seem that impressive, lots of people interview movie stars. --GRuban (talk) 15:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, I came by to promote this, but the hook fact needs an inline cite per WP:DYK#Cited hook. It's a great image, but the hook isn't really lead-worthy. Yoninah (talk) 11:33, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Moved a cite up to the relevant sentence in the body. You also really don't like the hook? I thought it was pretty hooky. I could rephrase it, I guess, maybe:

• ALT1: "...that Nabil Ahmad (pictured) became a comedian after a friend signed him up for a reality show as a prank?", if you think that's better. Let's call that 1A.

Or we could go for something completely different:

• ALT2: "...that Nabil Ahmad (pictured) became a television host because being a comedian was too much pressure?" (2) or
• ALT3: "...that Nabil Ahmad (pictured) was awarded the Best Entertainment Presenter/Host at the Asian Academy Creative Awards?" (3)

but, at least to me, neither of those have as much of the element of the unexpected that I see as "hooky". @Gerda Arendt:, do you agree the first one could be more lead-worthy, and do you like any of those better than the first? --GRuban (talk) 14:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

• Thank you for the new alts, GRuban. I do like ALT1. Yoninah (talk) 14:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

The part about it being a prank needs to be added/cited in the article. Yoninah (talk) 14:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Added, same source. --GRuban (talk) 14:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

• Great, thanks. Restoring tick for ALT1 per Gerda Arendt's review. Yoninah (talk) 15:50, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Neelofa and Nabil Ahmad on MeleTOP episode 100.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC)