Talk:Nabi Samwil

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

A fact from Nabi Samwil appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 October 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,417 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Palestinian village of Nabi Samwil, near Jerusalem, is regarded by Muslims, Jews and Christians alike as a holy site for containing the tomb of Samuel?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/October.

Wikipedia

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Mid‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

pictures..

If you go to http://lcweb2.loc.gov/pp/mdbquery.html and search for Samwil, you get lots of pictures from Nabi Samwil, mostly from 1917, as there apparently were major battles between the Ottomans and the British here. See eg. http://memory.loc.gov/pnp/matpc/12300/12315v.jpg Regards, Huldra (talk) 02:33, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move

This move, while well-intentioned, is not a good choice. The English transliteration of the Arabic the prophet Samuel should not have its primary target be a redirect to this prophet when the term is used in English for the village in the West Bank (eg [1], [2], [3], [4]. I am asking an admin revert the move, and if the user wishes to move the page he open a request as outlined at WP:RM. nableezy - 08:46, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The term "Samwil" alone could be redirected to the article on the prophet, but in Western sources, "Nabi Samwil" refers to the village. I just moved it back. --Al Ameer son (talk) 17:31, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Al Ameer. Nice to see you around nableezy - 17:33, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in SWP

The picture on SWP III, p. 150 is supposed to be Nabi Samwil: of course it is not. This is a typo from SWP, the picture is actually of the Maqam at Sar'a. See Talk:Sar'a. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Municipal boundaries of Jerusalem

The shrine is not within the municipal boundaries of Jerusalem. The source is wrong about that. Actually you can see the municipal boundary as a thin grey line on the map presented there. I checked it on two good quality modern maps too. For example see the yellow boundary in the Jerusalem inset of this 2014 Btselem map (if it doesn't break your computer). The shrine is in the "seam zone" though. Zero^talk 02:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nabi Samwil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080125080612/http://jmcc.org/palculture/go.htm to http://www.jmcc.org/palculture/go.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1967 War

The article claims, based on a dead link, that 1000 inhabitants fled during the war. Two lines earlier, it is stated that a mere 6 years earlier the population was less than 170. This village had around 200 inhabitants throughout its recorded history Here come the Suns (talk) 15:39, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added an Israeli source. There are possible explanations (including error) but without more evidence we follow the sources. Zero^talk 03:47, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is still dubious, per the above. Here come the Suns (talk) 03:58, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Added a couple more sources, idk why the figure from Jordanian registry is low but if there 250-300 left after many fled in 67, it is certainly possible that the population was 1000. Selfstudier (talk) 11:53, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]