Talk:NVivo

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ad?

Am I the only one who feels like this entry reads like an advertisement? I may do a bit of searching and see if the text is cribbed directly from an ad. As is, though, it seems to offer little info about the programs actual uses, but lots of buzzwords and excessive bits of info.

If I'm just being grumpy, please say so. But I'm wondering if others feel similarly.

Mgllama (talk) 19:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree -- the neutrality of this page is definitely suspect. taqwoman 18:20, 6 Sept 200969.159.4.247 (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This page is very non-wiki and very vendory sounding. Randomdestructn (talk) 19:38, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this is marketing copy. Ashooner (talk) 00:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is the Nvivo marketing brochure: Nvivo 8 Brochure PDF^{[dead link‍]} —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashooner (talk • contribs) 00:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not only potentially biased, it also does an incredibly poor job of describing what the software actually does. It's full of vague descriptions which are designed to sound impressive, but doesn't explain the basic functions to someone who has never used it. 158.143.82.199 (talk) 16:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A COI tag was placed on the article in August 2019. I've just removed that tag after also removing all the unsourced statements, removing a direct quote copy/paste copyright violation, and specifying at one point that something is claimed by the developer, rather that reported as a straight fact. Damien Linnane (talk) 12:15, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

Here's a free access paper if anyone wants a paper citation.

http://caqdas.soc.surrey.ac.uk/QUICworkingpapers.html^{[dead link‍]} —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.12.238 (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NVivo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111111191319/http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx to http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Version history

In the section 'Version history' the latest update is "NVivo (Release 1.0) / Nvivo 1.0 – March 18, 2020 (Windows & Mac)", but from some suppliers, I hear that there are a version 14 and a version NVivo calls either '20' or 'The New NVivo'. Is that correct? And is March 2020 really the very latest release? Laurier (talk) 10:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Someone (anonymous) updated the information, thank you! Laurier (talk) 08:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]