Talk:NLTS conjecture
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NLTS was proven a few years ago
[edit]Article is in need of an update to reflect the proof of NLTS from a few years ago: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3564246.3585114 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:1C86:F00:ACC7:98D6:7E06:91B1 (talk) 03:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Lead is way too technical
[edit]Most readers will already be totally and irretrievably lost in the first sentence of the lead. --Lambiam 18:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- If you can figure out a simpler way to summarize the topic according to reliable sources, please do! The void century (talk) 18:36, 23 December 2022 (UTC)