This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
NATO bombing of Albanian refugees near Gjakova is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
NATO bombing of Albanian refugees near Gjakova is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original orplagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Nick-D (talk) 05:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC) Nick-D (talk) 05:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article's title is Gjakova. All related articles use Gjakova. The current title was changed in 2015. @Amanuensis Balkanicus: if you to change the title, file a move request and the community will decide the outcome of your request. Peja changed after a discussion which lasted two months. Article titles are not going to change without a consensus. Thank you.--Maleschreiber (talk) 00:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It was changed without any discussion in 2015 by sockmaster Lindi29. The fact that Lindi29 was not reverted for this long is a travesty. It's on you to demonstrate why the sockmaster shouldn't be reverted, not on me to file a move request. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I can't know the details of someone's editing history five years ago. This is a WP:STABLE title which corresponds to cross-article consistency: Gjakova. I've had to file RM even for articles which I knew that I was the only person who was interested. And I remember that Peja was changed after a very difficult discussion. Toponyms can't be changed via simple move. The community can discuss all changes via WP:RM. Thank you.--Maleschreiber (talk) 00:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]