Jump to content

Talk:N500 Naviplane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How can we have both the Mountbatten class hovercraft and the N500 Naviplane referred to as the largest hovercraft in the world? The Mk III variant of the Mountbatten was 56.38m long, 23.77m beam and was heavier than the N500. I think we need to update one or both of the articles. Bliskner (talk) 09:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a classic case of interpretation, and also a question of timing.
The original SRN4 was a tad under 40m long, and weighed in at 165t (or 200t for the Mark 2).
The N500 Naviplane came in at 50m length, and was proposed as a 260t vehicle (118t plus payload), although it appears the actual design fell short of some of these targets.
The normal measure for ship size is displacement (tonnage), but as Hovercraft ride above the waterline, overall size may well be the better measure, and by this measure the N500 was indeed larger.
However... the prototype N500 only held this record for 14 days before being destroyed by fire. The second N500 was completed 'some time later', entering service July 5, 1978. Unfortunately for the Naviplan, GH-2007 Princess Anne had meanwhile undertaken upgrade to a Mark3 and returned to service a month earlier (6 April 1978). And at 56m this was now the largest Hovercraft.
Summary; as a prototype, and prior to completing trials (i.e. not yet in service), the N500 was briefly the largest hovercraft.
In contrast the SRN4 was the largest such vehicle for the vast majority of the 32 years it was in service (1968-2000), and absolutely the largest hovercraft in full passenger service.
WendlingCrusader (talk) 14:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on N500 Naviplane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]