Talk:Myth of meritocracy

This page was proposed for deletion by Damiens the Regicide (talk · contribs) on 17 February 2024.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Social Work Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Work, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Social Work on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Social WorkWikipedia:WikiProject Social WorkTemplate:WikiProject Social WorkSocial work articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Mid‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality of article disputed

This article in its present form is not neutral and should be removed. 2001:B011:3800:5AF9:54BD:714C:2109:B450 (talk) 11:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 2001:B011:3800:5AF9:54BD:714C:2109:B450, always happy to hear how an article can be improved. Can you expand upon where or how the artice is not neutral? Without specific ideas, I wouldn't know where the problem might be. If you, or other editors, discuss a non-NPOV here, I'd be happy to try working on any problems identified, If no-one comments by, say, the end of June, I will feel justified in removed the neutrality dispute banner you added. Hope to hear from you. 49.177.73.238 (talk) 11:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@2001:B011:3800:5AF9:54BD:714C:2109:B450: P.S. One- or two-word summaries, something like "comment" or "NPOV dispute" are fine. 49.177.73.238 (talk) 11:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - First of all I know from personal experience, whether it's here on Wikipedia, or out there in the workforce that meritocracy is in fact a myth. Two things can be true at the same time though, sometimes people born into tremendous wealth and privilege DO work hard sometimes, but that's a correlation/causation fallacy. Hard work is just something that happens to temporarily overlap with success some of the time, it doesn't explain why so many people who are rich just collect passive income without doing any work, and it also doesn't explain why so many hard-working people are still poor anyway.

But who does explain it are people like Nick Hanauer who tell more of the truth about capitalism. In his now banned Ted Talk: "Beware, Fellow Plutocrats! The Pitchforks are Coming" he explains: "Let's be honest: I am not the smartest person you've ever met. I am certainly not the hardest working. I was a mediocre student. I'm not technical at all, I can't write a word of code. Truly, my success is the consequence of spectacular luck. Luck of birth, circumstance and timing." Ted Talk still available on youtube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2gO4DKVpa8 and Ted here: https://www.ted.com/talks/nick_hanauer_beware_fellow_plutocrats_the_pitchforks_are_coming?language=en Jester6482 (talk) 00:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted

This article is unnecessary. Any criticism of meritocracy belongs here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Meritocracy. This article is essentially "Criticism of Meritocracy," in the spirit of "Criticism of Socialism/Capitalism" but meritocracy does not have criticisms frequent or diverse enough to warrant a dedicated article. The article awkwardly begins "Myth of meritocracy is a phrase..." "Myth of meritocracy" is not a common or important enough phrase to get its own article.72.66.112.80 (talk) 03:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - This is not a good suggestion because wikipedia has a track record of not allowing discussion of "contentious topics" on the talk page. See Wikipedia:Snowball clause since any challenges on the Meritocracy page wouldn't have a snowball's chance in hell of being left up instead of archived and/or removed, no need to attempt such a change. When talk pages become so heavily restricted to the point of censoring any criticisms, the ONLY way left to be neutral is to have multiple articles (this one already WAY less likely to be seen than than "Meritocracy" page, so Wikipedia's overall bias is already in your favor) Jester6482 (talk) 00:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Steinbeck misquotation

Seems like this article is using a misquotation by Steinbeck about "temporarily embarrassed millionaires". There is a discussion about it on Wikiquote: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Steinbeck#Disputed

It might not be clear whether Steinbeck ever mentioned "temporarily embarrassed millionaires", but this article sources a study, which proposes a clear citation, America and Americans. That book has a quote about middle class activists being temporarily embarrassed capitalists, so it's a pretty liberal paraphrasing. Unless there is a clear source with the quote, I propose to remove that part to avoid spreading the misquotation. Veenver (talk) 19:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]