Jump to content

Talk:Mykola Zlochevsky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Zlochevsky has not been indicted

[edit]

There are stories spreading on certain news outlets that Zlochevsky has been indicted. These stories are fake — the credited source is Interfax, a Russian news outlet, and the article does not make such a claim. NBC has more about this. – bradv🍁 22:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to add a paragraph about the Nov 14th, 2019 Ukrainian MP Statement. How about the draft paragraph below? Notice that the key words here are "to be indicted". So yes in the future Zlochevsky is "to be indicted", but no in the past Zlochevsky was not "indicted". An Ukrainian MP making a statement on state television that Zlochevsky is "to be indicted" is significant. I suggest to include this into the Wikipedia article.
Those are reportedly the word use by the Ukrainian MP Statement. I tried to include both point of views (POV), but according to Reuters' news, Zlochevsky whereabouts cannot presently be determined. So I guess he did not yet expressed his view. This is the suggested draft with sources.
Jack Posobiec at OANN is your source? Was Kisevalter Nash? (talk) 01:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On November 14, 2019 Ukrainian MP said that Zlochevsky is to be indicted, claiming among other things that Hunter Biden and his partners received $16.5 million for their "services."[1]
Sources

  1. ^ Posobiec, Jack (2019-11-20). "Ukrainian MP says Burisma head to be indicted, Hunter Biden slush fund named". One America News Network (OAN). Archived from the original on 2019-11-21. Retrieved 2019-11-21.
Francewhoa (talk) 22:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Francewhoa, One America News Network is not a reliable source. And be aware that, per my note above, a lot of these stories are fake. – bradv🍁 04:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CNN IS OK THOUGH. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:300C:6FC:C000:38B0:9BD9:37E6:B116 (talk) 19:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected theft of government funds on an especially large scale

[edit]

I suggest to add a paragraph about the statement from the Ukrainian authorities. How about the draft paragraph below? I tried to include both point of views (POV), but according to Reuters' news, Zlochevsky whereabouts cannot presently be determined. So I guess he did not yet expressed his view. This is the suggested draft with sources.

According to Ukrainian authorities Zlochevsky is suspected of "theft of government funds on an especially large scale". Still according to the Ukrainian authorities, the criminal investigation on suspicion of embezzlement is on hold, because Zlochevsky whereabouts cannot presently be determined.[1]
Sources

  1. ^ Zhegulev, Ilya (2019-11-20). "Ukraine widens probe against Burisma founder to embezzlement of state funds". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2019-11-20. Retrieved 2019-11-20.

Francewhoa (talk) 22:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2016 asset siezure

[edit]

Should this be added to the article?

https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/322395.html

> Court seizes property of ex-minister Zlochevsky in Ukraine

> The PGO clarifies that the court satisfied the petition on February 2, 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.212.91.77 (talk) 23:24, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish?

[edit]

Is Zlochevsky Jewish? 92.15.226.80 (talk) 18:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]