Talk:My Lego Network

Question

Would it be alright if I recreated this article? It is a pretty major Lego website, and does have sources other than the site itself. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from EWikist, 23 May 2010

{{editprotected}} There is a lot of information about My Lego Network being added to the Lego.com article. This page would be better suited as a redirect to Lego.com#My Lego Network than Lego Group. EWikist (Talk to me) 16:06, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could I first ask you to add reliable sources to that article to prove that it meets our notability requirements? See Wikipedia:Notability (web) for detailed requirements. Thanks. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A bunch of references were added. How's it now? EWikist (Talk to me) 20:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} There is a lot of information about My Lego Network being added to the Lego.com article. This page would be better suited as a redirect to Lego.com#My Lego Network than Lego Group. The Lego.com page is now fully referenced. EWikist (Talk to me) 23:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC) EWikist (Talk to me) 23:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~I'm not an admin, so i obviously can't say yes or no, but as far as i know, talk pages generally aren't fully protected, only semi. Pilif 12 p 02:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

I note that most of the sources are not independent, and I'm not sure about the reliability of the others. But it's a good start and I've implemented the requested edit. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 03:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! EWikist (Talk to me) 21:34, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 2 February 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This page is a double redirect; consider redirecting this to Lego instead 86.22.8.235 (talk) 19:30, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done also lowered protection slightly — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:33, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]