Talk:My Friend Hitler

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 18:12, October 26, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Can "The Great Soviet Encyclopedia" really be considered as a valid source to judge Mishimas work as anti-fascist/fascist?

Leaving aside the the guaranteed ideological bias of any state owned literary production in the USSR, it is just an encyclopedia, oriented towards a brief summary and not a comprehensive analysis of the work. 193.40.244.205 (talk) 01:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is it was a rhetorical question? Can "Britannica" really be considered as a valid source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.141.233.189 (talk) 00:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

==why bother editing rubbish like this when people just remove corrections?==--Daveymac41 (talk) 10:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC) I get fed up with people trying to protect their versions of articles because they like them, with no regard to objectivity or truth. The play IS considered sententious and tedious.--Daveymac41 (talk) 10:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on My Friend Hitler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120717095848/http://spb.geometria.ru/articles/reviews/1756 to http://spb.geometria.ru/articles/reviews/1756

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]