Jump to content

Talk:Muvattupuzha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

a blog explaining muvattupuzha :http://www.johnsongeorge.com/mvpa.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.5.28 (talk) 10:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting Muvattupuzha District
[edit]

Please Go through this forum brainstorming support for much needed Muvattupuzha district. http://www.forum.kochinow.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=245&p=14841#p14841 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.32.112 (talk) 20:27, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moovattupuzha is a small town with a separate culture and identity than that of ernakulam ,idukki ,kottayam or thrissur.Moovattupuzha,kothamangalam and some parts of kunnathunad shares a similar language and culture which is completely different and independent.I likes it.neither south nor north or west or east. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.7.11 (talk) 09:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

from Malayalam Wikipedia page of Muvattupuzha:

ഭാവി

മുവ്വാറ്റുപുഴ ജില്ല 1970കൾ മുതലേ വടക്കൻ തിരുവിതാംകൂർ മേഖലയിൽ ജനങ്ങൾ പ്രതീക്ഷിച്ചിരുന്നു. 1990കളിൽ കെ.കരുണാകരൻ മുഖ്യമന്ത്രി ആയിരിക്കുമ്പോൾ ഏതാണ്ട് പ്രഖ്യാപിച്ചതുമാണ്. പിന്നീട് അത് അട്ടിമറിക്കപ്പെട്ടു. ഈ പ്രദേശത്തെ ജനങ്ങളുടെ ചിരകാലാഭിലാഷമായിരുന്നു. മുഖ്യമായും കോതമംഗലം,മുവാറ്റുപുഴ താലൂക്കുകൾ, അതായത് പിറവം,കൂത്താട്ടുകുളം,കുന്നത്തുനാട് താലൂക്കിന്റെ കിഴക്കു ഭാഗങ്ങൾ - കോലഞ്ചേരി,പട്ടിമറ്റം,,തൊടുപുഴ താലൂക്ക്, കോട്ടയം ജില്ലയിലെ വെളിയന്നൂർ പഞ്ചായത്ത് എന്നീ പ്രദേശങ്ങൾ ഉൾപ്പെടുത്തി പുതിയ ജില്ല ആണ് ആദ്യം മുതല്ക്കേ ജനങ്ങൾ ആവശ്യപ്പെടുന്നത്.

എറണാകുളം ഭാഗങ്ങളിൽ നിന്ന് വ്യത്യസ്ഥമായ വടക്കൻ തിരുവിതാംകൂറിന്റെ,"കീഴ് മലനാടിന്റെ" തനതായ സംസ്ക്കാരം,ഭാഷ ശൈലി, ജീവിത ശൈലി, കൂടാതെ ജില്ലാ ആസ്ഥാനമായ എറണാകുളം നഗരത്തിലേക്ക് 50കി.മി യിൽ കുറയാത്ത ദൂരം എന്നിവയെല്ലാം പുതിയ മുവ്വാറ്റുപുഴ ജില്ലയുടെ ആവശ്യത്തെ കാണിക്കുന്നു. മലനാട് ജില്ല അതായത്, ഇപ്പോഴത്തെ ഇടുക്കി ജില്ല ഉണ്ടായത് മുവാറ്റുപുഴ ജില്ല ആവശ്യത്തെ തകിടം മറിച്ചു. അതു വരെ വികസനം തൊട്ടു തീണ്ടാത്ത തൊടുപുഴ പട്ടണം, ഇടുക്കി ജില്ലയുടെ അനൌദ്യോകിക ആസ്ഥാനമായി. ഇടനാട് പ്രദേശത്തെ ഉൾപ്പെടുത്തി മുവാറ്റുപുഴ ജില്ല പ്രഖ്യാപിച്ചാൽ അത് തൊടുപുഴ ഉൾപ്പെടെയുള്ള ഇടനാട്-മലയോര പ്രദേശത്തിന്റെ സന്തുലിതമായ വീകസനം കൂടുതൽ മെച്ചപ്പെട്ടതാകും. എന്നാൽ എറണാകുളം-കൊച്ചിൻ മഹാനഗരമായി വളർത്തുക എന്ന പേരിൽ മുവാറ്റുപുഴ,കോതമംഗലം താലൂക്കുകൾ ഉൾപ്പെടുന്ന കാർഷിക-ചെറുകിട വ്യവസായ മേഖലയെ എറണാകുളം ജില്ലയിൽ തളച്ചിടപ്പെട്ടിരിക്കുന്നു. ഈ പ്രദേശം കൊച്ചി,കോട്ടയം/ഇടുക്കി,ത്രിശൂർ ജില്ലകളിൽ നിന്ന് വ്യത്യസ്ഥമായ സ്വന്തം സംസ്കാരമുള്ളതാകുന്നു.[4] http://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B4%AE%E0%B5%82%E0%B4%B5%E0%B4%BE%E0%B4%B1%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%B1%E0%B5%81%E0%B4%AA%E0%B5%81%E0%B4%B4_%E0%B4%AA%E0%B4%9F%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%9F%E0%B4%A3%E0%B4%82#.E0.B4.AD.E0.B4.BE.E0.B4.B5.E0.B4.BF — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.11.138 (talk) 12:39, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalising
[edit]

Now Muvattupuzha article is also occassionally attacked by Vandals..!sad but Reality.I humbly request all those Who Follow this Article,Please Revert or Correct the Original Article from Vandals.I wanted to start a discussion on this several months back.now, I have no other Options but to start sharing this here:

I have seen some anonymous are trying to vandalize the Article by adding their prejudices and their likes.case in question is the ip 155.56.68.214.He/She Wants to Add to portray a place "Kalloorkkad" as a main part of Muvattupuzha town.being from this town, I know that Kalloorkkad is 16kms from Muvattupuzha and is never a Part of this Town.by Suburban towns, We Mean Towns Less than 5-10kms Distance and Which are Integral of the Main town.

See His EDITS: http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Muvattupuzha&oldid=381301088 http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/155.56.68.214

Some People Wants to Write about their Establishments be it Factory,Goat Farm(!),Collages,Rural Panchayats etc etc. Some Others Wanted to Call Muvattupuzha town as "high range"!it is unlikely that Muvattupuzha is part of Highrange.till Thodupuzha,Moolamattam it is Low land Plains with Hills and We call it MIDLANDS in Englisch and IDANAD in malayalam(Theeradesham,IDANAD,MALANAD).Historically, before Marthandavarma king of Travencore defeated this Place ,Muvattupuzha was part of Vadakkum Koor Kingdom and this Region is Called Keezh-Malanad or idanad this included current places like Kolenchery,Puthenkurish etc.So Claiming Muvattupuzha part of Highrange is falderal.may be the One Who edited this article is originally from pala or thodupuzha Whom wants to bring every towns into "highrange" tag.no please!

Some Wants to Portray that this Town is all about Syrian Christians(See the link ACHAYAN added on "Also See" Section).What is the Relation Dear Friend?Moovattupuzha is not Thodupuzha or Kothamangalm or Pala or Angamaly as it is COMPLETELY about Achayan.You hafta relate things.This Town and Nearby Areas has Majority Hindu,Mappila Muslim Populations too Which are By the Way Higher or Equal to Syrian Christians. :)

DEAR, Wikipedia being available to Edit FREELY is Not a Reason that You can post your Jingoistic/Parochial Feelings to this Article.This Article Must Stand as a Template for Anything Muvattupuzha Related.OR If You are New to Wikipedia and wants to EXPERIMENT EDITING,You search in google/bing for "MEDIAWIKI".

if you love your Collage or Your Gramam, Feel Free to Register and Write a Article on Your Gramam/collage/factory Here.But, PUHLEASE Stop Vandalizing it.

Thanks For Your Support, A Muvattupuzhakkaran. 202.55.82.74 (talk) 22:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS FOR LOCKING DOWN MUVATTUPUZHA ARTICLE. Much needed. Please Lock until these few who want to enforce their POV(like palakkaran achayan on achayan tag,kalloorkkadan for kalloorkkad,and other copra sellers. it seems that some of these fellows want to misalign the neutrality of article by saying Muvattupuzha is similar to idukki and kottaayam. this kind of unsolicited,no references to cite sources are been carried on to this article for long. please lock this page whenever necessary like above case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.35.19 (talk) 18:58, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muvattupuzhakkaran's statement that "Vadakkum Koor Kingdom and this Region is Called Keezh-Malanad or idanad this included current places like Kolenchery,Puthenkurish etc." to my knowledge is wrong. Kolenchery and Puthencruz is in Kunnathunad Taluk and parts of this Taluk was never under Vadakancore. These areas formed part of Perumpadappu Swaroopam — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.96.46.40 (talk) 03:45, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding References and Sources for this Page about Muvattupuzha- Please Read On

[edit]

This is a town in a Indian State Kerala and Malayalam is the Language there.Sources I've added are from Malayalam Online Newspaper website Editions as well as Other Sources and When and Wherever Possible ,Added English Sources.Please Understand or Wait till these sources can be translated(like google translations service). Thanks 59.93.32.156 (talk) 21:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KM George

[edit]

Was KM George a minister while representing Mvpa ? If yes, that might be worth a mention. Similarly for PC Thomas. Tintin 15:13, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No.K M George was representing poonjaar constituancy (Near Irattupetta)when he was a minister.P C THomas was not a minister yet.

PC Thomas was a minister in the BJP ministry Tintin 00:45, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

need to put images.

[edit]

Somebody need to put images of Muvattupuzha town/Maps.also the contents.

wikitravel muvattupuzha

[edit]

Have a look@ wikitravel Muvattupuzha(Prakash J K) http://wikitravel.org/en/Muvattupuzha

Good stuff ! Tintin 20:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Myself

[edit]

I am the Original contributor of this page as Anonymous.Felt there are more things to be collected and added to this page. 

                              -Sameer P.A

Sameer 10:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zilla or "Jilla"

[edit]

I understand few indic languages of all,district is "Zilla" and Pronounced somewhat near to "Jilla".

Edappally Swaroopam

[edit]

as reg sources,it is hard to get as i searched.but as a resident of the town,i heard that although Muvattupuzha was part of Travancore,the lands many are holded by Perumpadappu Swaroopam and Edappilly Swaroopams.Hope i can get some sources for this.Praka123 19:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the source regarding: http://www.muvattupuzha.com/religion.htm Praka123 (talk) 11:43, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muvattupuzha Loksabha Constituency

[edit]

Due to lesser amount of population growth due to high education and especially the decline of population in Syrian Christians and FW castes like Nairs in this taluka and nearby areas ,the Muvattupuzha Loksabha Constituency was dissolved.Now ,Erstwhile Constituency parts like Muvattupuzha,Kothamangalam are annexed to the highrange constituency of Idukki.the interests of Midland Voters cannot be heard now as the tag "idukki" will cover the western parts midlands like thodupuzha,kothamangalam and muvattupuzha.such a sad loss for Muvattupuzhakkar. 59.93.40.97 (talk) 01:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of unsourced+personel boosting+advt

[edit]

Discuss here, if there is any changes we need to made for the Education section, as it look's like an advertisement and boosting for some colleges...--...Captain......Tälk tö me... 08:15, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it doesn't look like like an advertisement.Rahuljohnson4u (talk) 06:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Spam#External_link_spamming & Wikipedia:NOTADVERTISING#ADVERTISING --...Captain......Tälk tö me... 11:22, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holy Magi Forane Church.JPG Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Holy Magi Forane Church.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thodupuzha fans

[edit]

Please stop editing Muvattupuzha article. Your town was a small junction in the 70s when Muvattupuzha along with Kottayam, Changanassery, Cherthala, Aluva were important towns. Remember your town has a puny 50,000 population after adding 40 sq.kms of area around the town! Also, the growth is artificial powered by political groups and that does not mean that you can simply destroy the history and glory of Muvattupuzha.

Muvattupuzha - it is 2nd after Palakkad to see a big urban grouping in the eastern side with continuous urban growth. Census 2011 also shows the UA (urban agglomeration) of Kothamangalam-Muvattupuzha which are twin-towns with a good hope to be a big city in the eastern region of Kochi. Thodupuzha or Palai are hill bound towns with the people typically are not exposed to urban living or lacks urbanization. I've seen hateful edits from wiki editors from Thodupuzha-Pala areas. Some of these fellows thinks that Muvattupuzha was unnecessary town in between Kochi and Thodupuzha(village outgrown into town). Let the time speaks - You cannot artificially grow such low urban region like Thodupuzha to a city.

Muvattupuzha is already dead now. Once Thodupuzha-Ernakulam sub urban high way materializes, muvattupuzha is just a stop over of the highway. Muvattupuzha doesn't have anything to offer to be attractive. Just a thickly populated region which has nothing to offer. Thodupuzha area is blessed with abundant land in the Municipal limits itself, plenty of fresh water, picturesque scenary, tourist places at 2 hours drive, supportive & suggestive administration, politically peaceful area, already established many industries which are running fine. Understand that first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.42.197.35 (talk) 18:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prot level 30 June 2016

[edit]

Muvattupuzha

[edit]

Full-protection: High level of persistent vandalism and POV editing by User:Kokkarani. Renaming place name from Muvattupuzha to Moovattupuzha without any proof or citations. 116.68.122.103 (talk) 07:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong venue. Moving to WP:RFPP — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 07:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, See WP:PROT. no, not enough disruption or warring to warrant full protection. The description here is actually kind of misleading. If there's serious content dispute issues, escalate it if need be. Mostly, the additions need copyediting/ grammar checks, and a few more reliable citations. non-admin response — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 07:12, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Muvattupuzha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Muvattupuzha&oldid=1224926928"