Talk:Music Genome Project

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mentioning vectors and genes is somewhat ambiguous. Assuming they're just using a multivariable regression or neural net to gauge listener preferences, why not refer to the genes as variables and omit the term vector? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtation (talk • contribs) 17:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From what I gather, it's a much, much simpler n-dimensional vector distance function.--69.65.178.16 (talk) 03:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC) (2ltben)[reply]

my question is... how can they do this in a legal way? is itunes providing the songs?

because they only use streams (like Yahoo! Launchcast, Rhapsody, etc.) I think artists are more forgiving. they also have paid memberships and ads to pay the royalties, I believe. – ugen64 16:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article is not about Pandora

I'm deleting the third paragraph because it is information about Pandora rather than the Music Genome Project, which can be found under the article for Pandora which is conveniently linked for anyone who is curious.--24.190.122.122 20:07, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lauded

What does "lauded" mean?

praised, as in cum laude ("with praise"), magna cum laude ("with great praise") etc Liamdaly620 14:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"lauded" like in applauded, to give praise...

Is there anything like this for books?

This is great for finding similar music that might interest you, but is there anything like the genome project for finding books that are similar that I might like? That would also be really helpful. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.91.147.34 (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Just ask your librarian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjprice1 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this will be much harder. The real "smarts" comes from the human judgment of the attributes of a piece. It takes much, much longer for a person to read a book than to listen to a song. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.255.172 (talk) 12:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Free music

I remember hearing after the block of UK to pandora happened, that they were working on a Pandora.com style site for royalty free music. Is there anywhere that has information proving this to be true? -NeF (talk) 12:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

William who?

The hyperlink for "William Nelson" goes to a disambiguation page. There is no indication which William Nelson is the relevant one. Googling for "William Nelson" and "Music Genome Project" yields nothing useful. 207.188.235.142 (talk) 17:19, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism?

Given that the system's fairly obviously flawed, with genes like 'gender of lead vocalist' (which isn't going to impact on your enjoyment of the song), I'm surprised that there isn't any 122.105.140.146 (talk) 10:26, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is your opinion, while I personally think it works well. In any case, a criticism section would need to be based on notable criticism of the project in reliable sources (e.g. publications), not the opinion or original research of Wikipedia editor(s).

As for "gender of lead vocalist", it's not very representative of the genes the project tracks... perhaps it was included because it's easy to understand for non-musicians. That said, remember that there are hundreds of genes tracked, and a gene might be irrelevant to some stations and relevant to others. For example, it might make sense for a Riot grrrl station to favor female vocalists, while also playing some songs by male vocalists. No trait would absolutely include/exclude a song, it's a question of probabilities. Proxyma (talk) 20:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. I have a Spotify playlist/channel that's for female artists. Sometimes I just feel like listening to women sing. 128.95.48.156 (talk) 20:36, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link/ref #4 is dead... <eom>

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.115.207 (talk) 19:20, 30 May 2013‎

I replaced that one, and tagged another. –Quiddity (talk) 21:11, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Attributes

A fairly complete if not complete list of attributes can be found here: http://dictionary.sensagent.com/list%20of%20music%20genome%20project%20attributes%20by%20type/en-en/ Pulu (talk) 00:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Music Genome Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080822172005/http://blog.pandora.com:80/faq/ to http://blog.pandora.com/faq/#79

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Music Genome Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20110718135118/http://thisweekintech.com/itn6 to http://thisweekintech.com/itn6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]