Talk:Museum of Northern Arizona

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arizona Mid‑importance

	Arizona portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arizona, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Arizona on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArizonaWikipedia:WikiProject ArizonaTemplate:WikiProject ArizonaArizona articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reads like a brochure

I've tagged this as reading like an advertisement, which applies to brochure copy. Other than the first section, it's not encyclopedic. Some examples.

"They eloquently described the wonders of the vast region—colors to delight the artist, Native American peoples to engage the anthropologist, traces of human occupation to occupy the archaeologist, an open textbook for the geologist, plants and wildlife to intrigue the biologist and botanist—in short, an area abundant with treasures to delight both scientist and visitor. "
" In between are nearly limitless examples of the Earth's natural history, brought close together in an area that provides an unending laboratory for the inquisitive.*
"At the same time, its staff and researchers continue their studies, because science, like life, is not static—it is ever-evolving."

Almost none of this has any sources. And some of it is about Arizona, not the museum. The writing does neither the museum or Wikipedia any favors. I suggest deleting all of it except the first section, leaving it as a stub for a proper article to be written. Barte (talk) 17:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've pared the article back and removed the brochure style tag per my comments above. There's certainly room for more, but additions should be written in an encyclopedic style with citations. All additions should clearly relate to the museum, not just the history and virtues of Northern Arizona. As noted, the entry still needs additional verification. Barte (talk) 16:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]