Talk:Muscatine, Iowa

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Iowa portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

MuscaBus was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 17 July 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Muscatine, Iowa. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Untitled

Welcome to the Muscatine Discussion page. I am Kopf1988. If you need any information about Muscatine, post here, and I may periodically provide such information.

Kopf1988 04:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Musical

In ten years... will the musical still be appropriate to be in the article? If no... should it be here now? Kopf1988 05:21, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No...and no...that's why it's not anymore. Nyttend 22:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Underground railway

My late mother Florence Athony(Johnson) family tghe Anthonys immigated to Muscatine Iowa in 1820 They had a Underground railway station ! Good Friends,QuckersAndreisme (talk) 23:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental problems section

The Environmental concerns section has been edited by User: KentWW to put a considerable gloss on a poor environmental history in the town. This edit is a SPA with on,ly 4 edits, all to this article. In the additional material added is included the sentence "Gage Kent, CEO at Kent Corporation, parent to Grain Processing Corporation commented that Muscatine is his home and the home for executives, employees and their families". The similarity between the name of the CEO and this user's name and the spin put on the environmental record, gives very good ground for assuming a conflict of interest. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 20:26, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the KentWW edit should have been removed. I live in Muscatine. I don't live in the south end of Muscatine, but I do work in the south end. The "environmental problems" section of this page needs to be updated to reflect what has transpired over the last 8 years since 2015. It's been years since I edited a wiki article, so I'll have to re-train myself, but I would propose the following two sentences to cover the last 8 years:

"In July 2015 the company agreed to new, more stringent, air emissions permits with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources and federal regulators. The company moved from coal to natural gas as their fuel source and built a new animal feed dryer to meet these new permit requirements. [cite https://web.archive.org/web/20160622124451/http://muscatinejournal.com/news/local/muscatine/muscatine-businesses-dnr-develop-pollution-reduction-plan/article_5ef09f4a-e955-5e11-abc7-132e6a9eb423.html and https://web.archive.org/web/20170510071214/http://muscatinejournal.com/news/local/gpc-s-conversion-to-natural-gas-is-complete/article_93e6adcb-2859-5c88-aeb3-ced4de7b8c49.html]"

I want to quantify the new permits that GPC had to agree to, but the Iowa DNR website uses javascript to view air permits, so it doesn't give a useful URL link. I'm trying to answer the 'how much more stringent?' question. The lower emissions are refenced in the 2nd cited news article. Are those numbers acceptable to copy here with citation? The Center for Public Integrity cited webpage also links to the reduction numbers stated by GPC in a different press release. Between that and the news article, I think that meets Wikipedia's sourcing requirements. The Center for Public Integrity citation addresses the fine that GPC paid for violating yearly operating limits, so I should be able to remove that 'citation needed' tag while I'm at it. Maxpower2911 (talk) 13:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added this change, with one more sentence to describe the pollution reduction. I agree that linking to the IDNR website doesn't do much good wrt sourcing. Gravel for breakfast (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It took a little digging, but I think I summarized the years 2014-2022 in a WP:NPOV with governmental sourcing.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Muscatine, Iowa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Parade incident

I thought about adding a section for the 2023 parade incident. I came to the conclusion that it wouldn't be notable 5 years from now. I see @Kristincedar added a section for this today. I could be convinced both ways on this, but I lean towards this being relevant news this week, but not relevant info about Muscatine 5 years from now. I guess my vote would be to revert, or make the section a lot shorter. Maybe revisit in a couple months and see how people feel about it? Gravel for breakfast (talk) 15:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think we have enough time behind us to review the parade incident using WP:EVENT. The inclusion criteria are:

1. An event that is a precedent or catalyst for something else of lasting significance is likely to be notable. Answer: No

2. Notable events usually have significant impact over a wide region, domain, or widespread societal group. Answer: No

3. An event must receive significant or in-depth coverage to be notable. Answer: No, it received blurb level coverage and a couple quotes.

4. Notable events usually receive coverage beyond a relatively short news cycle. Answer: Short news cycle.

5. Significant national or international coverage is usually expected for an event to be notable. Wide-ranging reporting tends to show significance, but sources that simply mirror or tend to follow other sources, or are under common control with other sources, are usually discounted. Answer: Almost all the news sources copied 2 local news station reports.

I've came to the conclusion that this event is not notable and I'm going to remove it. Gravel for breakfast (talk) 13:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]