Talk:Murshid

Please combine with Pir article to make a Pir/Murshid article or A Pir O Murshid article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:|User:]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs) Muzammilpalla786.

A murshid is different than a pir. A pir is necessarily fully enlightened. The murshid is often merely a teacher and does not need to be enlightened. Pipaaz (talk) 21:08, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge vs Deletion

I think that an article explanating this term is infornative and encyclopedic. So I think that even if the article fails notability, a redirect to another, as relevant as possible, article that offers an explanation for the term is very reasonable. Hoverfish Talk 11:44, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there no AfD? This is not any cruft article to be treated so.

And by the way I do not find any AfD page where anyone can support this article. Why so? There is a timebomb on it and no way to support it? So what if I cannot find any citation. This is an informative article and other articles, like Murid depend on it. Additionally, I think that this article, and possibly several related ones, suffer from systemic bias problems. Hoverfish Talk 11:56, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know very little about the subject, but there appears to be plenty of refs to murids and murshids in scholarly literature on Google Books, e.g. A Note on Adab in the Murshid-Murid Relationship by MOHAMMAD AJMAL. No idea if the article should be merged or improved in some other way, but certainly it should not be deleted without a proper AfD (which would include notification to the notice boards of the relevant projects, to draw more knowledgeable editors' attention to the article). -- Vmenkov (talk) 18:54, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

I have deleted the "prod" tag, as per advice in Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion#Objecting. One certainly can bring this to a normal AfD if desired. -- Vmenkov (talk) 18:56, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Vmenkov, I removed the merge tag because I would rather see this article improved than merged. So long as it will not disappear in thin air, it can still be improved. Hoverfish Talk

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Murshid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150920103237/http://www.sultan-ul-arifeen.com/en/murshid-kamil-akmal-sultan-ul-arifeen-perfect-spiritual-guide-mentor-imperfect-false-murshid-e-uqba-dunya.php to http://www.sultan-ul-arifeen.com/en/murshid-kamil-akmal-sultan-ul-arifeen-perfect-spiritual-guide-mentor-imperfect-false-murshid-e-uqba-dunya.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:40, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]