This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latino and Hispanic heritage, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Hispanic and Latino Americans on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latino and Hispanic heritageWikipedia:WikiProject Latino and Hispanic heritageTemplate:WikiProject Latino and Hispanic heritageLatino and Hispanic heritage
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
More than once, the George Floyd article has been added as a "See also" link at the bottom of this article, as seen here. Does anyone know what the purported connection between Vanessa Guillén and George Floyd would be in this regard? AzureCitizen (talk) 02:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@CookieMonster755: I noticed you added back the sexual assault category a few minutes ago after I swapped it out the other day with the sexual harassment category. From what I understand, Guillen told her family she was being sexual harassed and was going to report the offender (presumably Robinson, who the family believes killed her after she confronted him about reporting him on 22 April), but did not allege that he had sexually assaulted her. Can you explain the rationale for adding the sexual assault category? Thanks, AzureCitizen (talk) 16:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article currently includes the text 'CID reported that they found no evidence that Guillén was assaulted', so it does seem slightly odd at the moment, unless further facts emerge suggesting that sexual assault was a factor in this case. Robofish (talk) 23:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I looked up this article because of the VanessaGuillen meme on the internet, which is all about the institutionalized attempts to bury this case without investigation.
This article does not even hint at this aspect of it. The article, as it stands, appears to be a poster child about a murder that prompted a forthcoming investigation which successfully dealt with a toxic community where sexual harassment was acceptable.
because the conspiracy theories being pushed on social media didn’t actually exist?
Besides, it is covered in he article. "her mother told reporters she did not trust the U.S. Army's handling of the investigation, and her attorney, Natalie Khawam,[15] said she believed the family was "being kept in the dark"[14] because few details had been released regarding Guillén's disappearance." JeffUK (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Murder is defined as homicide involving intent and premeditation; your point about the title is valid. There is a question about whether the killing was murder.Parkwells (talk) 20:18, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added content to article about legislation, both state and federal, and Executive Order that have been passed following the military, FBI and civil investigations and findings about Guillen's death, the military justice system, and systemic issues of sexual harassment and assault in the military. Both state and federal legislation has been named after Guillen, indicating what a catalyst her death and her family's activism have been in making changes. Congressional representatives and senators have also worked on these issues for years. I will also add more about this to the Lede of the article. Parkwells (talk) 20:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One reference should NOT be enough to slander a candidate for President just before an election about something that (even if true) happened years ago. Paulsnx2 (talk) 00:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not debunked because there is nothing to debunk. The only "evidence" offered is hearsay from nameless bureaucrats. That's not something that can be proven wrong, and the extraordinary allegations shouldn't be accepted as reality without some extraordinary evidence. Jayelljaytoo (talk) 21:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
