Talk:Murder of Lakhvinder Cheema

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lancet

The poisoning as unusual enough to be reported in the medical journal The Lancet (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61059-8). JFW | T@lk 10:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where?

The article ignores a pretty fundamental bit of data: WHERE did this crime take place? There are scattered clues that it took place in the United Kingdom, but it needs to state explicitly in which country and city the crime took place. Boneyard90 (talk) 00:47, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Potential vandalism

Hi, I've just undone some potential vandalism that survived here for >2 weeks. I've incorporated edits by Bill william compton since the dubious edits to ensure no loss of data. Pursey ^{Talk | Contribs} 08:06, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User is now blocked for the third time and all their defamatory edits struck from the page history. Worth keeping an eye on this page as I expect they will return once their block expires (in one month's time). Thanks for highlighting this, as I had missed their latest vandalism.--Shakehandsman (talk) 22:27, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Like ants crawling all over you"

Since when did the DAILY MAIL become a credible source for symptoms of poisoning? I'd sooner take my medical advice from tea leaves and tarot cards than that rot. If anyone can find a reliable source that shows formication as a symptom of Aconitum poisoning, feel free to correct me.

-AS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.104.148.184 (talk) 13:37, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Murder of Lakhvinder Cheema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111008230958/http://www.courtnewsuk.co.uk/video_vaults/?page=3 to http://www.courtnewsuk.co.uk/video_vaults/?page=3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]