Jump to content

Talk:Murder of Adrianne Reynolds

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

COI

[edit]

Article creator seems to specialize in True Crime topic articles, which while covering other topics and seemingly unrelated, has a strong theme of female perps, and in general seem to connect with the publisher of the book on the murder of Adrianne Reynolds, which also happens to be a case of a female perp. WP:AGF tells us to assume good faith, so it could be a coincidence, but WP:DUCK suggest more like a COI hidding the fact by posing as a "true crime" fan. The lack of responsiveness on the part of this user is not conducive to a solution, and the fact this article has proven controversial, precisely because its creation coincides with publishing of the single book on the topic, crate the conditions for COI.--Cerejota (talk) 19:25, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting use of WP:DUCK. The article's main contributor looks like a true crime fan... therefore he's most likely a shill for a true crime publisher? I "specialise" in archaeology articles, does that mean I have a conflict of interest too? Am I editing on behalf Archaeopress? Sounds more like WP:NOTDUCK to me: "if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it's probably a fox dressed up as a duck". joe•roetc 20:03, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Duck is in that if I were an undisclosed COI focusing on a newly released book, I would disguise myself as a true crime fan. The lack of communication and community involvement, and the failure to address the issues raised in the AFC process are also ducky, as I mentioned. It could be a NOTDUCK, but I would rather have them tell us that. --Cerejota (talk) 20:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever the issue is with the COI, I don't see any evidence, and there is no constructive action proposed even so.  What we have now is a solidly sourced article that a reliable source identifies as "shocking" (see the Quad-City Times article of January 21, 2010 here).  Unscintillating (talk) 14:56, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ADRIANNE.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:ADRIANNE.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:54, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Murder of Adrianne Reynolds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Murder of Adrianne Reynolds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:41, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]