Talk:Munsee
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Needs work, but needed
[edit]This article is largely based on two old encyclopedia articles. For the modern era, it relies on its see also section for the moment. There is a lot in the see also articles which would be valuable here, and perhaps can just be transferred. I think the Munsee topic is deserving of its own article rather than just a redirect to Lenape. That link is still prominent, but hopefully some better Munsee-specific information can start accumulating and developing here. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 22:25, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Yupik people which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cayuga people which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:03, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Munsee people → Munsee – target is redirect to current title, created July 16, 2012 by Bob Burkardt, contrary to WP:UNDAB Skookum1 (talk) 03:49, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose until the issue is addressed properly. These should be discussed at a centralized location.
- There was a discussion once on whether the ethnicity should have precedence for the name, and it was decided it shouldn't. That could be revisited. But it really should be one discussion on the principle, not thousands of separate discussions at every ethnicity in the world over whether it should be at "X", "Xs", or "X people". — kwami (talk) 12:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support per nom. An identified people should be the primary topic of a term absent something remarkable standing in the way. bd2412 T 02:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support as per the policy Wikipedia:Article titles#Use commonly recognizable names and the guideline Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ethnicities and tribes). The section Wikipedia:Article titles#Precision also applies given that Munsee redirects here. There is no need to redo any guideline as it already supports the un-disabiguated title. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 04:56, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- Start-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Low-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class Ontario articles
- Low-importance Ontario articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class New York (state) articles
- Low-importance New York (state) articles
- Start-Class Wisconsin articles
- Low-importance Wisconsin articles