Talk:Multivariate testing in marketing/Archives/2013
This is an archive of past discussions about Multivariate testing in marketing. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Small correction needed
Google Content Experiments DOES NOT support multivariate testing.
Please see http://support.google.com/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1745147&topic=1745207&ctx=topic — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.44.241.132 (talk) 13:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Old comments
"...allows internet marketeers to ensure that visitors are being effectively exploited (i.e. Serviced)..."
Exploited=Serviced? You should be ashamed of yourselves. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.154.168 (talk) 02:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Drake Direct does not appear to offer a multivariate testing solution for websites and as such I feel it may be appropriate to remove this. Their website reads as though they introduce clients to these services and provide consultancy on how to employ them. I do not want to remove this link however without seeking a consensus on the matter. AlasdairBailey 22:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Here, here. I have never heard of them. [no sig]
I've also removed the link to their presentation given at a DMA conference as it added very little in terms of 'encylopedic content' and was full of advertising messages AlasdairBailey 08:07, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
I have just undone two edits (removals of valid info) by user 59.93.195.237 as info was removed without any justification by an annoymous user AlasdairBailey 07:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
well done alasdair. - James
Gentlemen, I am so sorry but I feel I have every bit of a right to be on this page as you do. You should do your homework and take a closer look at my credentials.
Perry Drakedirect 20:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
-- Uh. Sure. But you can't put yourself on. Look up wikipedia's prohibition on referencing your own stuff and original content 61.9.244.124 (talk) 06:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
There are three ways to design an experiment and all three should be listed. Someone keeps taking out Choice Modeling and Experimental Design. Taguchi is not the only way and it is a disservice to those interested in MVT to say that Taguchi is the only method for MVT. -James Hurst
can the annonymous users who are conintually removing James Hurst's writings please justify this action or our only course of action will be a complaint and IP ban AlasdairBailey 09:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Every day someone is editing out anything to do with Choice Modeling, a experimental design used 100s of times across the globe. Please explain your reasoning, I'm sick of having a wikipedia battle -James Hurst
59.93.205.31 - please also be warned, your edit constituted vandalism of this page - Maxymiser is a multivariate testing company. Does anyone know if it is possible to ban annonymous edits of this page to stop these guys vandalising it? AlasdairBailey 08:49, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
we need to ban these anonymous edits asap. every day they vandalize this page.
-James
What's the deal. Who keeps removing Atlas Solutions from the "companies providing multivariable testing" section? Atlas is the real deal, and has provided 100's of said services, offering both the technology and the consulting. No different than Offermatica. If somebody feels differently, please say so. Briendownie 19:34, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
a vendor favoring Taguchi, perhaps OFFERMATICA is vandalizing this page, on a daily basis.
It's somebody from Conversion Multiplier. Two reasons:
1. He'll remove both "amadesa" and "atlas solutions" because they appear before his company (in the alphabetical list). Why don't you change your name to "aConversion Multipler" or better yet "AAA Conversion Multiplier"
2. His IP address shows India, and Conversion Multiplier has an office in India.
Seems to make sense. Do we accept Discospinster's edit and eliminate all companies? Briendownie 16:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
i think the list of companies is beneficial here as it will help those looking for mvt to understand who offers it AlasdairBailey 22:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- I did a great job of posting my own IP address as being the vandal, oops. (it was conversion multiplier india in fact 58.xxxx). I see that my list of experimental designs won out so that's great. unfortunately, I'm banned from editing anything on this page. -James —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.15.3.211 (talk • contribs)
- Yes, you did. Your self-accusations were quite confusing. Dicklyon 20:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- And you weren't blocked, just warned. Use the talk page instead of edit warring. Can you tell me what you had in the mind with the strange non-parallel list of three things, one of which is devoid of apparent substance? Dicklyon 06:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
All I tried to add was that Taguchi is not the only experimental design. there are three dominant theories in the market place, in addition to full and fractional factorial which are not listed there.
Anyway, I'm glad someone stepped in to fix this page.-James
- so, someone is anonymously removing choice modeling.
again, someone is taking out choice modeling, a competing methodology to offermatica and optimost. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.15.3.211 (talk) 21:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
The list of companies who use multivariate testing
What value did that paragraph add to the article? Are there any sources confirming that companies in that rather large list are notable? Please read Wikipedia is not for advertising.
Revision as of 19:35, 17 February 2013 (edit) (undo) 192.76.7.218(talk)