Talk:Multilevel feedback queue

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Untitled

Multi-level feedback queueing should not be credited to Kleinrock in 1970, when it is documented as in use in CTSS as early as 1963 by:

F. J. Corbató, et al, The Compatible Time-Sharing System A Programmer's Guide (MIT Press, 1963) ISBN 978-0-262-03008-3, pp 11. Belzberg 20:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects?

I am not yet confident enough to add them myself, WP:BOLD notwithstanding, but perhaps MLFQ could redirect here? MFQ is an airport, so I am even less sure about that... 50.27.189.83 (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done A search shows no other use of the acronym on WIkipedia and a web search shows this to be a valid acronym. Opencooper (talk) 01:07, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]