Talk:Mulberry Plantation (Kershaw County, South Carolina)

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).

It is requested that a photograph of more recent vintage be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in South Carolina may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mulberry Plantation (James and Mary Boykin Chesnut House). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606135735/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=-877017370&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=-877017370&ResourceType=Building

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

James Sr.

It was James Sr. who owned Mulberry, not his son James Jr. (the husband of the diarist). They did not reside at Mulberry, she did not spend most of her diary chronicling it (in fact she hated the place). I have made som changes, and removed references to James Jr.'s legislative career. Creuzbourg (talk) 14:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wealth impossible without slavery?

As of December 14, 2024, the article says, "All of this wealth would have been impossible without the forced labor of the hundreds of enslaved people that Chestnut held in ownership." In addition to being unsourced, isn't that also objectively false? Far larger fortunes were amassed, back then and since, without slavery.

Is there any objection to the sentence's deletion? Going once… Going twice…. 2603:6010:100:6E85:20E2:4920:8804:978C (talk) 20:16, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]