Talk:Mulberry Commons

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Urban studies and planning Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mulberry Commons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150404064700/http://gothamist.com/2014/12/19/nycha_newark_corruption.php to http://gothamist.com/2014/12/19/nycha_newark_corruption.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links

External links provide information on the development of park/surrounding area useful to reader, but may be too detailed to include in article.08:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Djflem. The External Links removed from the article did not meet WP:EL. First, "links to dead URLs in a list of external links are of no use to Wikipedia articles". Of the six links that you've added back to the article, *four* are actually dead links. Secondly, these resolutions absolutely can be used as cites, as evidenced by other resolutions, PDFs and government docs already used as cites for this article. Thirdly, and most importantly, WP:ELPOINTS #3: "Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum." I appreciate you're trying to add to the usefulness of the article, but incorporating the pertinent information into the article and using the appropriate, working links as citations would be far more useful. If you continue this conversation, please let me know you've done so by adding a {{u|Stesmo}} in your text. Also, you can sign your comments by adding ~~~~ at the end, like this: Stesmo (talk) 05:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC) Thanks![reply]