Talk:Muhammad Shams-ul-Haq Azimabadi

This article was nominated for deletion on August 24, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Islam: Muslim scholars Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Muslim scholars task force.

Sources

I noticed that a new editor recently tried to nominate this article for deletion improperly, likely due to lack of familiarity with deletion policy (I'm in the same boat somewhat) and not seeing the previous AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shams-ul-haq Azeemabadi. Suffice to say that because he is the most prominent person to comment on one of the six canonical books of Sunni Islam, he is quite notable but I understand why a person reading this article wouldn't realize that. The article is poorly written and totally lacking in sources. I am confident that, given the time and effort of concerned editors (I volunteer some of my editing time as well), the notability of the subject can be established. This will, of course, required translation; an unfortunate aspect of notable Muslim religious figures is that much of the sources material is in languages other than English, but given that translations on the part of Wikipedia editors are allowed in certain circumstances, I don't see that as a major issue. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:03, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Muhammad Shams-ul-Haq Azimabadi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060716020721/http://www.muhaddithazimabadi.net/ to http://www.muhaddithazimabadi.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]