Talk:Mrs Hinch

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 June 2021. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Autism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Inappropriately tagged for speedy deletion

The tag for speedy deletion that's been added seems to be entirely vexatious and inappropriate. There's no promotional material on the page and the page is fully referenced and about a notable public figure. If there are concerns about the page quality it would perhaps have been appropriate to revert to draft status, but as it is this seems to be based on the personal biases of the user who added the tag, rather than any sound argument about the page content. Suttonpubcrawl (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Suttonpubcrawl (talk) 12:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This woman has written four best selling books and is a major public figure in the UK. I don't see how a page about her can be considered promotional when it is simply summarising the facts about someone who is clearly a noteworthy figure and merits a Wikipedia article. I think the fact this has been tagged for speedy deletion is is symptomatic of Wikipedia editors' systematic bias against subjects they consider "low brow". I just can't see any valid justification for the tagging. Suttonpubcrawl (talk) 12:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to add that all information I've added has been meticulously referenced from reliable sources. Suttonpubcrawl (talk) 13:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]