Talk:Mr. Roboto Project

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 7 March 2021, see discussion.
Keep, 9 July 2018, see discussion.
no consensus, 9 July 2018, see discussion.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cooperatives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives

Untitled

I strongly believe that the Mr. Roboto Project article should be kept on Wikipedia. I have added third party sources to the article - sorry for not doing so earlier. The Mr. Roboto Project is a "noteable" music venue, similar to "924 Gilman Street" (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/924_Gilman_Street) and deserves inclusion on Wikipedia.

Doomtown412 (talk) 01:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you two articles are from an alternative weekly and a college newspaper, not exactly the top of the heap in unbiased, well researched reporting. Also, the standard is non-trivial coverage, and I'm not sure we're past that barrier either, as one article is mostly about upcoming shows, and the other is largely a review of the ADD fest (that sounds hilarious actually though). I looked at the other article you mentioned, and the only sources there were about Jello getting beat up there, so it has essentially the same problem. The fact is that nearly every city in the world where it's even legal to play punk shows has a venue like this, sometimes several, they are not all inherently notable. We have to remember that Wikipedia is written for a global audience, and not every tiny DIY club needs it's own encyclopedic article. However, PROD is for fairly uncontroversial deletions, and since you do object, I'm going to remove the notice from the article. Note that this does not mean the article is "safe", anyone could come along at any time and nominate it through Articles for Deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:04, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another article: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/03044/157451-28.stm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.228.199 (talk) 06:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Post-Gazette is a better source, and I am inclined to say leave this article on Wikipedia. --DThomsen8 (talk) 18:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]