Talk:Mountain papaya

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Screwy nomenclature

There is something strange going on with the nomenclature here at Babaco, and I'm having trouble figuring it out (the botanical literature in TROPICOS isn't helping). Babaco has a link at Vasconcellea cundinamarcensis which redirects to this page. The scientific name of Babaco follows Badillo. Here, Badillo's Vasconcellea cundinamarcensis is presented here as a synonym (replacement) for V. pubescens A DC. There is also Carica pubescens Linne & K. Koch; was that epithet published in Vasconcellea prior to DeCandolle? I'm not sure whether Badillo's cundamarcensis is really needed as replacement name. TROPICOS suggests that Linne & Koch's name is still a synonym for the other names. It would seem to have priority if V. pubescens DC is the same thing, in which case cundamarcensis isn't needed.Plantdrew (talk) 03:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't clearly understand the problem (language, time of day...) but in similar cases i like the site: http://www.theplantlist.org/ They list the accepted names and synonyms. --Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mountain papaya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Major Additions (November 2021)

In the context of a course on Alternative Crops, as a group we would like to enrich this Wikipedia page. We propose the addition of other relevant sections as well as a more detailed "Description" and "Cultivation" section.

To see how the page would look like with our additions, please visit my Sandbox: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:VanderLooEnrico/sandbox

We structured the main sections in the following order: "Description", "Breeding & Cultivars", "Cultivation", "Uses", "Nutrition", "History", "Invasiveness".

We added some more information about the plant in the "Description" section that better describes the plant, its characteristics (for example its sexuality) as this is missing.

In the "Cultivation" section we propose information on how to grow it, what conditions the plant needs, how to propagate it, how to harvest/process it and its pests & diseases in different subsections. We also propose to move what is currently written under "Cultivation" under a new section called "Breeding & Cultivars" with some additional information that is relevant for breeding. We did this because this plant has a lot of potential for breeding with other mountain papayas or even the common papaya (carica papaya) and therefore deserves a section of its own. Because of this relevance we decided to put this section before "Cultivation", after the "Description" section.

We then propose a section on the "Uses" of this plant with 3 subsections: Culinary Uses, Commercial Use, Medicinal Uses. This sections show what this plant can be used for, and therefore is very relevant for its Wikipedia page.

The next section we deem relevant is a section on "Nutrition", which is very relevant as it is an edible plant.

The last 2 sections we would like to add are "History" and "Invasiveness". "History" briefly covers some information we know on the past of this plant. The "Invasiveness" section is important because this plant has been introduced for example in New Zealand and established itself and this can become an issue as invasive species generally are problematic, and this is something to keep in mind if we want to grow it in other regions of the world.

Finally, we added 2 images from Wikipedia Commons, one showing what the flowers of the plant looks like, and the other illustrating a woman selling the fruits of this plant showing the importance of this crop in certain regions of South America. We also included all our references formatted as per the Wikipedia guidelines.

We are looking forward to what the Wikipedia community thinks about this edit and we would gladly work with the community to enrich this specific page! VanderLooEnrico (talk) 16:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]